EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 8 (2022) SICOT-J, 8 (2022) 48 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 8, 2022
Article Number 48
Number of page(s) 6
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2022048
Published online 16 December 2022
  1. Bijlsma JW, Berenbaum F, Lafeber FP (2011) Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet (London, England) 377(9783), 2115–2126. [Google Scholar]
  2. Evans JT, Walker RW, Evans JP, Blom AW, Sayers A, Whitehouse MR (2019) How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet (London, England) 393(10172), 655–663. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jones RK, Chapman GJ, Findlow AH, Forsythe L, Parkes MJ, Sultan J, Felson DT (2013) A new approach to prevention of knee osteoarthritis: Reducing medial load in the contralateral knee. J Rheumatol 40(3), 309–315. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang WJ, Sun MH, Palmer J, Liu F, Bottomley N, Jackson W, Qiu Y, Weng WJ, Price A (2018) Patterns of compartment involvement in end-stage knee osteoarthritis in a chinese orthopedic center: Implications for implant choice. Orthop Surg 10(3), 227–234. [Google Scholar]
  5. Andriacchi TP, Hurwitz DE (1997) Gait biomechanics and total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 10(4), 255–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McClelland JA, Webster KE, Feller JA (2007) Gait analysis of patients following total knee replacement: A systematic review. The Knee 14(4), 253–263. [Google Scholar]
  7. Beard DJ, Davies LJ, Cook JA, MacLennan G, Price A, Kent S, Hudson J, Carr A, Leal J, Campbell H, Fitzpatrick R, Arden N, Murray D, Campbell MK (2020) Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: The TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England) 24(20), 1–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Engh GA (2007) A bi-compartmental solution: What the Deuce? Orthopedics 30(9), 770–771. [Google Scholar]
  9. Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN (2010) Survival of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 5 to 23 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1), 64–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Engh GA, Parks NL, Whitney CE (2014) A prospective randomized study of bicompartmental vs. total knee arthroplasty with functional testing and short term outcome. J Arthrop 29(9), 1790–1794. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang Y, Yin M, Zhu S, Chen X, Zhou H, Qian W (2021) Patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 10(3), 203–217. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ramkumar PN, Harris JD, Noble PC (2015) Patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. Bone Joint Res 4(7), 120–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Batailler C, Bordes M, Lording T, Nigues A, Servien E, Calliess T, Lustig S (2021) Improved sizing with image-based robotic-assisted system compared to image-free and conventional techniques in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 103(B(4)), 610–618. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Konan S, Haddad FS (2016) Does location of patellofemoral chondral lesion influence outcome after Oxford medial compartmental knee arthroplasty? Bone Joint J 98-B(10 Suppl B), 11–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yamabe E, Ueno T, Miyagi R, Watanabe A, Guenzi C, Yoshioka H (2013) Study of surgical indication for knee arthroplasty by cartilage analysis in three compartments using data from Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). BMC Musculoskel Disord 14, 194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Parratte S, Ollivier M, Opsomer G, Lunebourg A, Argenson JN, Thienpont E (2015) Is knee function better with contemporary modular bicompartmental arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty? Short-term outcomes of a prospective matched study including 68 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(5), 547–552. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yeo NE, Chen JY, Yew A, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2015) Prospective randomised trial comparing unlinked, modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: A five years follow-up. The Knee 22(4), 321–327. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kooner S, Johal H, Clark M (2017) Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial compartment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Arthroplast Today 3(4), 309–314. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Garner AJ, Dandridge OW, van Arkel RJ, Cobb JP (2021) Medial bicompartmental arthroplasty patients display more normal gait and improved satisfaction, compared to matched total knee arthroplasty patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06773-8. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tan SM, Dutton AQ, Bea KC, Kumar VP (2013) Bicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty for medial and patellofemoral osteoarthritis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 21(3), 281–284. [Google Scholar]
  21. Blyth MJG, Banger MS, Doonan J, Jones BG, MacLean AD, Rowe PJ (2021) Early outcomes after robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Bone Joint J 103(B(10)), 1561–1570. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Elbardesy H, Awad AK, McLeod A, Farahat ST, Sayed SZE, Guerin S, Harty J (2021) Does bicompartmental knee arthroplasty hold an advantage over total knee arthroplasty? Systematic review and meta-analysis. SICOT J 7, 38. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schrednitzki D, Beier A, Marx A, Halder AM (2020) No major functional benefit after bicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty at 5-year follow-up. J Arthrop, 35(12), 3587–3593. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Biazzo A, Silvestrini F, Manzotti A, Confalonieri N (2019) Bicompartmental (uni plus patellofemoral) versus total knee arthroplasty: A match-paired study. Musculoskelet Surg 103(1), 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  25. Thilak J, Thadi M, Mane PP, Sharma A, Mohan V, Babu BC (2020) Accuracy of tibial component positioning in the robotic arm assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Orthop 22, 367–371. [Google Scholar]
  26. Thilak J, Babu BC, Thadi M, Mohan V, Arun Kumar T, Mane PP, Ravindran GC (2021) Accuracy in the execution of pre-operative plan for limb alignment and implant positioning in robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty and manual total knee arthroplasty: A prospective observational study. Indian J Orthop 55(4), 953–960. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Clement ND, Deehan DJ, Patton JT. 2019. Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis is cost-effective: A markov decision analysis. Bone Joint J 101(B(9)), 1063–1070. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ries MD (2022) Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty, in Essentials of Cemented Knee Arthroplasty. Hansen E, Kühn KD, Editors. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
  29. Beckmann J, Meier M (2022) The optimal indication for combined patellofemoral and unicondylar knee arthroplasty, in Basics in Primary Knee Arthroplasty. Becker R, Hirschmann MT, Kort NP, Editors. Springer: Cham. [Google Scholar]
  30. Demey G, Müller JH, Liebensteiner M, Pilot P, Nover L, European Knee Associates (EKA), Kort N (2021) Insufficient evidence to confirm benefits of custom partial knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06766-7. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gaudiani MA, Samuel LT, Diana JN, DeBattista JL, Coon TM, Moore RE, Kamath AF (2022) Robotic-arm assisted bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Durable results up to 7-year follow-up. Int J Med Rob, 18(1), e2338. . [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.