Open Access
Volume 9, 2023
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 8
Section Hip
Published online 17 January 2023
  1. Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL (2020) Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 35, S79–S85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Esposito CI, Carroll KM, Sculco PK, Padgett DE, Jerabek SA, Mayman DJ (2018) Total hip arthroplasty patients with fixed spinopelvic alignment are at higher risk of hip dislocation. J Arthroplasty 33, 1449–1454. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McKnight BM, Trasolini NA, Dorr LD (2019) Spinopelvic motion and impingement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 34, S53–S56. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Heckmann N, McKnight B, Stefl M, Trasolini NA, Ike H, Dorr LD (2018) Late dislocation following total hip arthroplasty: Spinopelvic imbalance as a causative factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100, 1845–1853. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vigdorchik JM, Sharma AK, Buckland AJ, Elbuluk AM, Eftekhary N, Mayman DJ, Carroll KM, Jerabek SA (2021) 2021 Otto Aufranc Award: A simple hip-spine classification for total hip arthroplasty : Validation and a large multicentre series. Bone Joint J 103-B, 17–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tezuka T, Heckmann ND, Bodner RJ, Dorr LD (2019) Functional safe zone is superior to the lewinnek safe zone for total hip arthroplasty: Why the Lewinnek safe zone is not always predictive of stability. J Arthroplasty 34, 3–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eftekhary N, Shimmin A, Lazennec JY, Buckland A, Schwarzkopf R, Dorr LD, Mayman D, Padgett D, Vigdorchik J (2019) A systematic approach to the hip-spine relationship and its applications to total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 101 B, 808–816. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ochi H, Baba T, Homma Y, Matsumoto M, Nojiri H, Kaneko K (2016) Importance of the spinopelvic factors on the pelvic inclination from standing to sitting before total hip arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 25, 3699–3706. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yun HH, Kim YB, Joo HJ, Koh YY (2022) Does spinopelvic motion change after total hip arthroplasty? Int Orthop 46, 2181–2187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Homma Y, Ishii S, Yanagisawa N, Ochi H, Baba T, Nojiri H, Okuda T, Kaneko K (2020) Pelvic mobility before and after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 44, 2267–2274. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nam D, Riegler V, Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Barrack RL (2017) The impact of total hip arthroplasty on pelvic motion and functional component position is highly variable. J Arthroplasty 32, 1200–1205. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lazennec JY, Charlot N, Gorin M, Roger B, Arafati N, Bissery A, Saillant G (2004) Hip-spine relationship: A radio-anatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning. Surg Radiol Anat 26, 136–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stefl M, Lundergan W, Heckmann N, McKnight B, Ike H, Murgai R, Dorr LD (2017) Spinopelvic mobility and acetabular component position for total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 99-B, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ike H, Dorr LD, Trasolini N, Stefl M, McKnight B, Heckman N (2018) Current concepts review spine-pelvis-hip relationship in the functioning of a total hip replacement. J Bone Jointt Surg Am 100, 1606–1615. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pierrepont J, Hawdon G, Miles BP, O’Connor B, Baré J, Walter LR, Marel E, Solomon M, McMahon S, Shimmin AJ (2017) Variation in functional pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Bone Jointt J 99-B, 184–191. [Google Scholar]
  16. Langston J, Pierrepont J, Gu Y, Shimmin A (2018) Risk factors for increased sagittal pelvic motion causing unfavourable orientation of the acetabular component in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 100B, 845–852. [Google Scholar]
  17. Grammatopoulos G, Gofton W, Jibri Z, Coyle M, Dobransky J, Kreviazuk C, Kim PR, Beaulé PE (2019) 2018 Frank Stinchfield award: spinopelvic hypermobility is associated with an inferior outcome after THA: Examining the effect of spinal arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 477, 310–321. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Innmann MM, Merle C, Gotterbarm T, Ewerbeck V, Beaulé PE, Grammatopoulos G (2019) Can spinopelvic mobility be predicted in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty? A prospective, diagnostic study of patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. Bone Joint J 101 B, 902–909. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Innmann MM, Merle C, Phan P, Beaulé PE, Grammatopoulos G (2020) How can patients with mobile hips and stiff lumbar spines be identified prior to total hip arthroplasty? A prospective, diagnostic cohort study. J Arthroplasty 35, S255–S261. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ransone M, Fehring K, Fehring T (2020) Standardization of lateral pelvic radiograph is necessary to predict spinopelvic mobility accurately. Bone Joint J 102-B, 41–46. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Behery OA, Vasquez-Montes D, Cizmic Z, Vigdorchik JM, Buckland AJ (2020) Can flexed-seated and single-leg standing radiographs be useful in preoperative evaluation of lumbar mobility in total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 35, 2124–2130. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Phan D, Bederman SS, Schwarzkopf R (2015) The influence of sagittal spinal deformity on anteversion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 97-B, 1017–1023. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ike H, Bodner RJ, Lundergan W, Saigusa Y, Dorr LD (2020) The effects of pelvic incidence in the functional anatomy of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102, 991–999. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tamura S, Nishihara S, Takao M, Sakai T, Miki H, Sugano N (2017) Does pelvic sagittal inclination in the supine and standing positions change over 10 years of follow-up after total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 32, 877–882. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.