EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2023) SICOT-J, 9 (2023) 1 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 9, 2023
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 8
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2022050
Published online 17 January 2023
  1. Noyer D, Caton JH (2017) Once upon a time. Dual mobility: History. Int Orthop 41, 611–618. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alberio RL, Rusconi M, Martinetti L, et al. (2021) Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures: Comparison between standard and dual mobility implants. Geriatrics (Basel) 6, 70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Batailler C, Fary C, Batailler P, et al. (2017) Total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach and dual mobility cup: Safe and efficient strategy against post-operative dislocation. Int Orthop 41, 499–506. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hoskins W, McDonald L, Claireaux H, et al. (2022) Dual-mobility constructs versus large femoral head bearings in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Hip Int 11207000221082928. https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000221082927. [Google Scholar]
  5. Schmidt A, Batailler C, Fary C, et al. (2020) Dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty: Efficient strategy to decrease dislocation risk. J Arthroplasty 35, 500–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Batailler C, Fary C, Verdier R, et al. (2017) The evolution of outcomes and indications for the dual-mobility cup: A systematic review. Int Orthop 41, 645–659. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Romagnoli M, Grassi A, Costa GG, et al. (2019) The efficacy of dual-mobility cup in preventing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int Orthop 43, 1071–1082. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leclercq S, El Blidi S, Aubriot JH (1995) Traitement de la luxation récidivante de prothèse totale de hanche par le cotyle de Bousquet A propos de 13 cas. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 81, 389–394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Philippot R, Farizon F, Camilleri J-P, et al. (2008) Survival of dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94, 43–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Epinette J-A, Harwin SF, Rowan FE, et al. (2017) Early experience with dual mobility acetabular systems featuring highly cross-linked polyethylene liners for primary hip arthroplasty in patients under fifty five years of age: An international multi-centre preliminary study. Int Orthop 41, 543–550. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chughtai M, Mistry JB, Diedrich AM, et al. (2016) Low frequency of early complications with dual-mobility acetabular cups in cementless primary THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474, 2181–2187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Farizon F, Baulot E, Fessy MH (2018) Historique: Des erreurs du passé à une double mobilité moderne. In: La double mobilité en marche dans les prothèses totales de hanche, Elsevier Masson. pp. 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lecuire F, Benareau I, Rubini J, Basso M (2004) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual mobility socket. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90, 249–255. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Neri T, Boyer B, Batailler C, et al. (2020) Dual mobility cups for total hip arthroplasty: Tips and tricks. Sicot J 6, 17. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Intraprosthetic dislocation: A specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 965–970. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vermersch T, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy M-H (2015) Prospective longitudinal study of one hundred patients with total hip arthroplasty using a second-generation cementless dual-mobility cup. Int Orthop 39, 2097–2101. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Prudhon J-L, Ferreira A, Verdier R (2013) Dual mobility cup: Dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up. Int Orthop 37, 2345–2350. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gaillard R, Kenney R, Delalande J-L, et al. (2019) Ten- to 16-year results of a modern cementless dual-mobility acetabular implant in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 34, 2704–2710. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Caton JH, Ferreira A (2017) Dual-mobility cup: A new French revolution. Int Orthop 41, 433–437. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Castiello E, Moghnie A, Tigani D, Affatato S (2022) Dual mobility cup in hip arthroplasty: An in-depth analysis of joint registries. Artif Organs 46, 804–812. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Horriat S, Haddad FS (2018) Dual mobility in hip arthroplasty: What evidence do we need? Bone Joint Res 7, 508–510. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Malatray M, Roux J-P, Gunst S, et al. (2017) Highly crosslinked polyethylene: A safe alternative to conventional polyethylene for dual mobility cup mobile component. A biomechanical validation. Int Orthop 41, 507–512. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Batailler C, Fary C, Servien E, Lustig S (2018) Influence of femoral broach shape on stem alignment using anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: A radiologic comparative study of 3 different stems. PLoS One 13, e0204591. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lustig S (2015) Anterior approach (without specific table) and dual mobility acetabular component. Maitrise Orthop 243, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  25. Aït Si Selmi T, Lustig S, Dojcinovic S, Neyret P (2006) Morbidity and reliability of total hip implants positioning using the posterior minimally invasive approach: A consecutive series of 100 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92, 752–759. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Foissey C, Fauvernier M, Fary C, et al. (2020) Total hip arthroplasty performed by direct anterior approach – Does experience influence the learning curve? Sicot J 6, 15. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Foissey C, Kenney R, Luceri F, et al. (2021) Greater trochanter fractures in the direct anterior approach: Evolution during learning curve, risk factors and consequences. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141, 675–681. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bauwens PH, Fary C, Servien E, et al. (2020) Early low complication rate of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach. Sicot J 6, 6p. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Widmer K-H (2004) A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 19, 387–390. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Foissey C, Fary C, Luceri F, et al. (2020) Transitioning the total hip arthroplasty (THA) technique from posterior approach in lateral position to direct anterior approach in supine position – risk factors for acetabular malpositioning and the learning curve. Int Orthop 44, 1669–1676. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121, 20–32. [Google Scholar]
  32. Farizon F, de Lavison R, Azoulai JJ, Bousquet G (1998) Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility. Int Orthop 22, 219–224. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Bauchu P, Bonnard O, Cyprès A, et al. (2008) The dual-mobility POLARCUP: First results from a multicenter study. Orthopedics 31. https://orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=37180. [Google Scholar]
  34. Leclercq S, Benoit J-Y, de Rosa J-P, et al. (2008) Results of the Evora dual-mobility socket after a minimum follow-up of five years. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94, e17–e22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, et al. (2011) The dual mobility socket concept: Experience with 668 cases. Int Orthop 35, 225–230. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hamadouche M, Arnould H, Bouxin B (2012) Is a cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 3048–3053. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Combes A, Migaud H, Girard J, et al. (2013) Low rate of dislocation of dual-mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 3891–3900. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fessy M-H, Jacquot L, Rollier J-C, et al. (2019) Midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes of a contemporary monoblock dual-mobility cup in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 34, 2983–2991. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Chouteau J, Rollier J-C, Bonnin MP, et al. (2020) Absence of instabilities and intra-prosthetic dislocations at 7 to 11 years following THA using a fourth-generation cementless dual mobility acetabular cup. J Exp Orthop 7, 51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Darrith B, Courtney PM, Della Valle CJ (2018) Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J 100-B, 11–19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, et al. (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38, 1125–1129. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gaudin G, Ferreira A, Gaillard R, et al. (2017) Equivalent wear performance of dual mobility bearing compared with standard bearing in total hip arthroplasty: In vitro study. Int Orthop 41, 521–527. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wegrzyn J, Antoniadis A, Sarshari E, et al. (2022) Polyethylene wear of dual mobility cups: A comparative analysis based on patient-specific finite element modeling. Int Orthop 46, 779–787. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Epinette J-A, Coulomb R, Pradel S, Kouyoumdjian P (2022) Do modular dual mobility cups offer a reliable benefit? Minimum 5-year follow-up of 102 cups. J Arthroplasty 37, 910–916. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Epinette J-A, Béracassat R, Tracol P, et al. (2014) Are modern dual mobility cups a valuable option in reducing instability after primary hip arthroplasty, even in younger patients? J Arthroplasty 29, 1323–1328. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kim Y, Morshed S, Joseph T, et al. (2006) Clinical impact of obesity on stability following revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453, 142–146. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Maisongrosse P, Lepage B, Cavaignac E, et al. (2015) Obesity is no longer a risk factor for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with a double-mobility cup. Int Orthop 39, 1251–1258. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Belgaïd V, Viste A, Fessy M-H (2022) Cementless hydroxyapatite-coated stem with dual mobility and posterior approach in over-80 year-old patients with osteoarthritis: Rates of dislocation and periprosthetic fracture at a mean 8 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 108, 103196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Affatato S, Castiello E, Amendola L, et al. (2020) Revision of a monoblock metal-on-metal cup using a dual mobility component: Is it a reasonable option? Materials (Basel) 13, E2040. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hallab NJ, Messina C, Skipor A, Jacobs JJ (2004) Differences in the fretting corrosion of metal-metal and ceramic-metal modular junctions of total hip replacements. J Orthop Res, 22, 250–259. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Cooper HJ, Della Valle CJ (2014) Large diameter femoral heads. Bone Joint J 96-B, 23–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kamara E, Robinson J, Bas MA, et al. (2017) Adoption of robotic vs fluoroscopic guidance in total hip arthroplasty: Is acetabular positioning improved in the learning curve? J Arthroplasty 32, 125–130. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.