EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2023) SICOT-J, 9 (2023) 16 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 9, 2023
Article Number 16
Number of page(s) 5
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023013
Published online 05 June 2023
  1. Huette P, Abou-Arab O, Djebara A-E, et al. (2020) Risk factors and mortality of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: A one-year follow-up study. Sci Rep 10, 9607. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haentjens P, Magaziner J, Colón-Emeric CS, et al. (2010) Meta-analysis: Excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Ann Intern Med 152, 380–390. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Health Investigators (2019) Total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. N Engl J Med 381, 2199–2208. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ (2001) Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83, 643–650. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hsueh K-K, Fang C-K, Chen C-M, et al. (2010) Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: An evaluation of 937 patients. Int Orthop 34, 1273–1276. [Google Scholar]
  6. De Bruijn K, den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer W, Roukema G (2012) Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94, 1266–1272. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kregor PJ, Obremskey WT, Kreder HJ, Swiontkowski MF (2014) Unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 28(Suppl 8), S25–S28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elis J, Chechik O, Maman E, Steinberg EL (2012) Expandable proximal femoral nails versus 95 dynamic condylar screw-plates for the treatment of reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures. Injury 43, 1313–1317. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Makki D, Matar HE, Jacob N, et al. (2015) Comparison of the reconstruction trochanteric antigrade nail (TAN) with the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the management of reverse oblique intertrochanteric hip fractures. Injury 46, 2389–2393. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang L, Mao Z, Tang P (2013) Comments on Kokoroghiannis et al.: Evolving concepts of stability and intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures – A review. Injury 44, 877–878. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DePuy Synthes (2020) TFN-ADVANCED proximal femoral nailing system (TFNA): Nail strength analysis. Des Evid, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lambers A, Rieger B, Kop A, et al. (2019) Implant fracture analysis of the TFNA proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101, 804–811. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tawari AA, Kempegowda H, Suk M, Horwitz DS (2015) What makes an intertrochanteric fracture unstable in 2015? Does the lateral wall play a role in the decision matrix? J Orthop Trauma 29(Suppl 4), S4–S9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuzyk PRT, Lobo J, Whelan D, et al. (2009) Biomechanical evaluation of extramedullary versus intramedullary fixation for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma 23, 31–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Swart E, Makhni EC, Macaulay W, et al. (2014) Cost-effectiveness analysis of fixation options for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96, 1612–1620. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Irgit K, Richard RD, Beebe MJ, et al. (2015) Reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with the long cephalomedullary nail. J Orthop Trauma 29, e299–e304. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Warschawski Y, Ankori R, Rutenberg TF, et al. (2021) Expandable proximal femoral nail versus gamma proximal femoral nail for the treatment of hip reverse oblique fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 777–785. [Google Scholar]
  18. Michael D, Yaniv W, Tal FR, et al. (2016) Expandable proximal femoral nail versus gamma proximal femoral nail for the treatment of AO/OTA 31A1-3 fractures. Injury 47, 419–423. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hopp S, Wirbel R, Ojodu I, et al. (2016) Does the implant make the difference? – Prospective comparison of two different proximal femur nails. Acta Orthop Belg 82, 319–331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hernández-Vaquero D, Pérez-Hernández D, Suárez-Vázquez A, et al. (2005) Reverse oblique intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with the gamma nail. Int Orthop 29, 164–167. [Google Scholar]
  21. Miedel R, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S, Tidermark J (2012) Musculoskeletal function and quality of life after an unstable trochanteric fracture treated with the trochanteric gamma nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132, 1495–1503. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Min W-K, Kim S-Y, Kim T-K, et al. (2007) Proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures compared with gamma nail. J Trauma 63, 1054–1060. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Park SY, Yang KH, Yoo JH, et al. (2008) The treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary hip nail. J Trauma 65, 852–857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Okcu G, Ozkayin N, Okta C, et al. (2013) Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: A standard or long nail? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 2768–2775. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Blum LE, Yee MA, Mauffrey C, et al. (2020) Comparison of reamed long and short intramedullary nail constructs in unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures: A biomechanical study. OTA Int Open Access J Orthop Trauma 3, e075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.