Open Access

This article has an erratum: []

Volume 9, 2023
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 7
Section Hip
Published online 21 April 2023
  1. Kenanidis E, Rigkos D, Paparoidamis G, et al. (2018) Surgical approaches of the hip. In The Adult Hip – Master Case Series and Techniques. Tsiridis E, Editor. Springer: Cham. p. 51–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Tsiridis E, Kenanidis E, Potoupnis M, Sayegh F (2020) Direct superior approach with standard instrumentation for total hip arthroplasty: safety and efficacy in a prospective 200-case series. Hip Int 30, 552–558. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berstock JR, Blom AW, Beswick AD (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the standard versus mini-incision posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29, 1970–1982. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrett AA, Ezzibdeh RM, Horst PK, Roger DJ, Amanatullah DF (2019) Direct superior approach to the hip for total hip arthroplasty. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 9, e17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Amanatullah DF, Masini MA, Roger DJ, Pagnano MW (2016) Greater inadvertent muscle damage in direct anterior approach when compared with the direct superior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 98-B, 1036–1042. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Duijnisveld BJ, van den Hout JAAM, Wagenmakers R, Koenraadt KLM, Bolder SBT (2020) No learning curve of the direct superior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Surg 12, 852–860. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Siljander MP, Whaley JD, Koueiter DM, Alsaleh M, Karadsheh MS (2020) Length of stay, discharge disposition, and 90-day complications and revisions following primary total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the direct anterior, posterolateral, and direct superior approaches. J Arthroplasty 35, 1658–1661. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bono OJ, Damsgaard C, Robbins C, Aghazadeh M, Talmo CT, Bono JV (2018) Influence of soft tissue preservation in total hip arthroplasty: a 16-year experience. Surg Technol Int 33, 301–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kenanidis E, Paparoidamis G, Pegios VF, Anagnostis P, Potoupnis M, Tsiridis E (2022) Earlier functional recovery and discharge from hospital for THA patients operated on via direct superior compared to standard posterior approach: a retrospective frequency-matched case-control study. Hip Int 19, 11207000221086506. [Google Scholar]
  10. Minokawa S, Naito M, Shiramizu K, Nakamura Y, Kinoshita K, Minamikawa T, Seo H, Yamamoto T (2018) Preservation technique of the piriformis tendon is superior to reattachment technique in terms of contiguity and muscle atrophy: using magnetic resonance imaging. Hip Int 28, 599–605. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Khan RJ, Lam LO, Breidahl W, Blakeney WG (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging features of preserved vs divided and repaired piriformis during total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 27, 551–558. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lalevée M, Matsoukis J, Beldame J, Brunel H, Billuart F, Van Driessche S (2021) MRI assessment of piriformis-sparing posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 107. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vasantharao P, Fenbury D, Khan R, Fick D, Dalgleish S, Finsterwald M, Castle H, Haebich S (2022) Anterior approach to hip replacement and associated complications: an independent review. Hip Int 32, 312–317. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang T, Shao L, Xu W, Chen H, Huang W (2019) Comparison of morphological changes of gluteus medius and abductor strength for total hip arthroplasty via posterior and modified direct lateral approaches. Int Orthop 43, 2467–2475. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gabor JA, Singh V, Padilla JA, Gupta S, Schwarzkopf R, Davidovitch R (2020) Clinical and radiographic outcomes after direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty using two specialized surgical tables. Arthroplast Today 6, 538–542. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Siddappa VH, Meftah M (2020) Piriformis-sparing technique in total hip arthroplasty with posterolateral approach. Surg Technol Int 36, 360–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Roche JJ, Jones CD, Khan RJ, Yates PJ (2013) The surgical anatomy of the piriformis tendon, with particular reference to total hip replacement: a cadaver study. Bone Joint J 95-B, 764–769. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Solomon LB, Lee YC, Callary SA, Beck M, Howie DW (2010) Anatomy of piriformis, obturator internus and obturator externus: implications for the posterior surgical approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92, 1317–1324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang D, Chen L, Peng K, Xing F, Wang H, Xiang Z (2015) Effectiveness and safety of the posterior approach with soft tissue repair for primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101, 39–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lazaro LE, Klinger CE, Sculco PK, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2015) The terminal branches of the medial femoral circumflex artery: the arterial supply of the femoral head. Bone Joint J 97-B, 1204–1213. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.