EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 9 (2023) SICOT-J, 9 (2023) 34 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 9, 2023
Article Number 34
Number of page(s) 6
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023033
Published online 30 November 2023
  1. Elfekky M, Mostafa H, Shahi U, et al. (2022) Causes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure: a meta-analysis. J Musculoskelet Surg Res 6, 193–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Magnussen RA, Lawrence JTR, West RL, et al. (2012) Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy 28, 526–531. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Conte EJ, Hyatt AE, Gatt CJ, Dhawan A (2014) Hamstring autograft size can be predicted and is a potential risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. Arthroscopy 30, 882–890. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mariscalco MW, Flanigan DC, Mitchell J, et al. (2013) The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multicenter orthopaedic outcomes network (MOON) cohort study. Arthroscopy 29, 1948–1953. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Salmon L, App B, Sci V, et al. (2005) Incidence and Risk Factors for Graft Rupture and Contralateral Rupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21, 948–957. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Getgood AMJ, Bryant DM, Litchfield R, et al. (2020) Lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduces failure of hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2-year outcomes from the STABILITY study randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 48, 285–297. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chechik O, Amar E, Khashan M, et al. (2013) An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices. Int Orthop 37, 201–206. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baawa-Ameyaw J, Plastow R, Begum FA, et al. (2021) Current concepts in graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. EFORT Open Rev 6, 808–815. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Papageorgiou CD, Ma CB, Abramowitch SD, et al. (2001) A multidisciplinary study of the healing of an intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament graft in a goat model. Am J Sports Med. 29 (5): 620–626. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamner DL, Brown CH, Steiner ME, et al. (1999) Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: Biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81, 549–557. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boniello MR, Schwingler PM, Bonner JM, et al. (2015) Impact of hamstring graft diameter on tendon strength: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 31, 1084–1090. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Snaebjörnsson T, Hamrin Senorski E, Ayeni OR, et al. (2017) Graft diameter as a predictor for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D values A cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register based on 2240 patients thorkell. Am J Sports Med 45, 2092–2097. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Spragg L, Chen J, Mirzayan R, et al. (2016) The effect of autologous hamstring graft diameter on the likelihood for revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44, 1475–1481. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pennock AT, Ho B, Parvanta K, et al. (2017) Does allograft augmentation of small-diameter hamstring autograft ACL grafts reduce the incidence of graft retear? Am J Sports Med 45, 334–338. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bourgeault-Gagnon Y, Leang AK, Bédard S, et al. (2022) A partial-thickness quadriceps autograft reliably augments the size of the hamstring graft during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 4, e2005–e2009. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilson WK, Morris R, Coskey A, et al. (2019) Quadriceps augmentation of undersized hamstrings during ACL reconstruction. Knee 26, 73–78. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nazari G, Barton KI, Bryant D, et al. (2021) Five- and six-strand hamstring grafts consistently produce appropriate graft diameters for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 2940–2947. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bickel BA, Fowler TT, Mowbray JG, et al. (2008) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging cross-sectional area for the measurement of hamstring autograft diameter for reconstruction of the adolescent anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 24, 1336–1341. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Goyal S, Matias N, Pandey V, Acharya K (2016) Are pre-operative anthropometric parameters helpful in predicting length and thickness of quadrupled hamstring graft for ACL reconstruction in adults? A prospective study and literature review. Int Orthop 40, 173–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pinheiro LFB, de Andrade MAP, Teixeira LEM, et al. (2011) Intra-operative four-stranded hamstring tendon graft diameter evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 811–815. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Walczak BE, Hetzel SJ, Akoh CC, Baer GS (2021) Intra-operative conversion to a five-strand hamstring autograft configuration significantly increases anterior cruciate ligament graft diameter independent of patient characteristics. J Knee Surg 34, 828–833. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Krishna L, Panjwani T, Ren Mok Y, et al. (2018) Use of the 5-strand hamstring autograft technique in increasing graft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 34, 2633–2640. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bourgeault-Gagnon Y (2023) Data diameter increase 4S to a 6S HS graft configuration. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/8HNPSC43MZ.1. [Google Scholar]
  24. Calvo R, Figueroa D, Figueroa F, et al. (2017) Five-strand hamstring autograft versus quadruple hamstring autograft with graft diameters 8.0 millimeters or more in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcomes with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 33 (5): 1007–1013. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Attia AK, Nasef H, ElSweify KH, et al. (2020) Failure rates of 5-strand and 6-strand vs. quadrupled hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction: a comparative study of 413 patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120946326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fujimaki Y, Thorhauer E, Sasaki Y, et al. (2016) Quantitative in situ analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 44, 118–125. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Krishna L, Panjwani T, Mok YR, et al. (2018) Use of the 5-strand hamstring autograft technique in increasing graft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 34, 2633–2640. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Snow M, Cheung W, Mahmud J, et al. (2012) Mechanical assessment of two different methods of tripling hamstring tendons when using suspensory fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 262–267. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.