EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 10 (2024) SICOT-J, 10 (2024) 33 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 10, 2024
Article Number 33
Number of page(s) 8
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024030
Published online 06 September 2024
  1. Kenanidis E, Milonakis N, Foukarakis G, Potoupnis M, Tsiridis E (2023) Superior Transverse Atraumatic Reconstruction (STAR) approach provides a better-compared outcome to standard Direct Superior Approach (DSA): a matched, prospective comparative single-surgeon study. SICOT J 9, 10. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Siddappa VH, Meftah M (2020) Piriformis-sparing technique in total hip arthroplasty with posterolateral approach. Surg Technol Int 36, 360–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Tan BKL, Khan RJK, Haebich SJ, Maor D, Blake EL, Breidahl WH (2019) Piriformis-sparing minimally invasive versus the standard posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up of a randomized control trial. J Arthroplasty 34, 319–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Khan RJK, Maor D, Hofmann M, Haebich S (2012) A comparison of a less invasive piriformis-sparing approach versus the standard posterior approach to the hip: a randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94, 43–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charity J, Ball S, Timperley AJ (2023) The use of a modified posterior approach (SPAIRE) may be associated with an increase in return to pre-injury level of mobility compared to a standard lateral approach in hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures: a single-centre study of the first 285 cases over a period of 3.5 years. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 49, 155–163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Moussallem CD, Hoyek FA, Lahoud JCF (2012) Incidence of piriformis tendon preservation on the dislocation rate of total hip replacement following the posterior approach: a series of 226 cases. J Med Liban 60, 19–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang T, Zhou Y, Li X, Gao S, Yang Q (2021) Comparison of postoperative effectiveness of less invasive short external rotator sparing approach versus standard posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Surg Res 16, 46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Viberg B, Kristensen EQ, Gaarsdal T, Petersen CD, Jensen TG, Overgaard S, Palm H (2023) A piriformis-preserving posterior approach reduces dislocation rate of the hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fracture. Injury 23, S0020-1383(23)00382-0. [Google Scholar]
  9. Apinyankul R, Satravaha Y, Mokmongkolkul K, Phruetthiphat OA (2023) Comparison of dislocation and outcome between piriformis-sparing and conventional posterior approach after bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in patients over 60 years. J Arthroplasty 38, 732–736. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dorr LD (2016) Posterior mini-incision approach for total hip replacement. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 10(6), e5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hanly JR, Sokolowski S, Timperley AJ (2017) The SPAIRE technique allows sparing of the piriformis and obturator internus in a modified posterior approach to the hip. Hip Int 27, 205–209. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ohyama Y, Iwakiri K, Ohta Y, Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Nakamura H (2023) Measurement of spinopelvic sagittal alignment in the relaxed seated position rather than in the straight seated position is suitable for assessing spinopelvic mobility in patients before total hip arthroplasty. SICOT J 9, 2. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tsiridis E, Kenanidis E, Potoupnis M, Sayegh F (2020) Direct superior approach with standard instrumentation for total hip arthroplasty: safety and efficacy in a prospective 200-case series. Hip Int 30, 552–558. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Widmer KH (2004) A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 19, 387–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Khalily C, Lester DK (2002) Results of a tapered cementless femoral stem implanted in varus. J. Arthroplasty 17, 463–466. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Danoff JR, Bobman JT, Cunn G, Murtaugh T, Gorroochurn P, Geller JA, Macaulay W (2016) Redefining the acetabular component safe zone for posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31, 506–511. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meermans G, Malik A, Witt J, Haddad F (2011) Preoperative radiographic assessment of limb-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 1677–1682. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vasantharao P, Fenbury D, Khan R, Fick D, Dalgleish S, Finsterwald M, Castle H, Haebich S (2022) Anterior approach to hip replacement and associated complications: an independent review. Hip Int 32, 312–317. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Solomon LB, Lee YC, Callary SA, Beck M, Howie DW (2010) Anatomy of piriformis, obturator internus and obturator externus: implications for the posterior surgical approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92, 1317–1324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Roche JJ, Jones CD, Khan RJ, Yates PJ (2013) The surgical anatomy of the piriformis tendon, with particular reference to total hip replacement: a cadaver study. Bone Joint J 95-B, 764–769. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lazaro LE, Klinger CE, Sculco PK, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2015) The terminal branches of the medial femoral circumflex artery: the arterial supply of the femoral head. Bone Joint J 97-B, 1204–1213. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Amanatullah DF, Masini MA, Roger DJ, Pagnano MW (2016) Greater inadvertent muscle damage in direct anterior approach when compared with the direct superior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 98-B(8), 1036–1042. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Koster M, Luzier AD, Temmerman OP, Vos SJ, Benner JL (2023) How do dislocation rates differ between different approaches to total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma Rehabil 30(1), 22104917221147688. [Google Scholar]
  24. Van Dooren B, Peters RM, Ettema HB, Schreurs BW, Van Steenbergen LN, Bolder SBT, Zijlstra WP (2023) Revision risk by using the direct superior approach (DSA) for total hip arthroplasty compared with postero-lateral approach: early nationwide results from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). Acta Orthop 94, 158–164. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Minokawa S, Naito M, Shiramizu K, Nakamura Y, Kinoshita K, Minamikawa T, Seo H, Yamamoto T (2018) Preservation technique of the piriformis tendon is superior to reattachment technique in terms of contiguity and muscle atrophy: using magnetic resonance imaging. Hip Int 28, 599–605. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.