EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 11 (2025) SICOT-J, 11 (2025) 27 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
Article Number 27
Number of page(s) 11
Section Spine
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025015
Published online 04 May 2025
  1. Abbas Z, Asati S, Kundnani VG, Jain S, Patel A, Raut S (2022) Learning curve of thoracic pedicle screw fixation by freehand technique. Indian Spine J 5, 106–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sulpis B, Neri T, Klasan A, Castel X, Vassal F, Tetard MC (2024) Isolated posterior stabilization in type B and C thoracolumbar fractures associated with ankylosing spine disorders: A single center experience with clinical and radiological outcomes. SICOT J 10, 26. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE (1990) Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine 15(1), 11–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Youkilis AS, Quint DJ, McGillicuddy JE, Papadopoulos SM (2001) Stereotactic navigation for placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Neurosurgery 48(4), 771–779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Heary RF, Bono CM, Black M (2004) Thoracic pedicle screws: postoperative computerized tomography scanning assessment. J Neurosurg Spine 100(4), 325–331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fayyazi AH, Hugate RR, Pennypacker J, Gelb DE, Ludwig SC (2004) Accuracy of computed tomography in assessing thoracic pedicle screw malposition. Clin Spine Surg 17(5), 367–371. [Google Scholar]
  7. Amato V, Giannachi L, Irace C, Corona C (2010) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the lumbosacral spine using conventional technique: computed tomography postoperative assessment in 102 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine 12(3), 306–313. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Salama AA, Amin MA, Soliman AY, El-Tantaway A (2019) Postoperative 320 multi-slice computed tomography in assessment of pedicle screw insertion in thoraco-lumbar fixation. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 50, 57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gümüşsuyu G, Kılıçaslan ÖF, Nabi V, Ertan MB, Köse Ö (2021) The reliability and accuracy of radiographs in the assessment of pedicle screw placement: a comparison with computerized tomography. J Turk Spinal Surg 32(2), 70–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Adamski S, Stogowski P, Rocławski M, Pankowski R, Kloc W (2023) Review of currently used classifications for pedicle screw position grading in cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 88(4), 165–171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zdichavsky M, Blauth M, Knop C, Graessner M, Herrmann H, Krettek C, et al. (2004) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine fractures: part I: inter- and intraobserver reliability of the scoring system. Eur J Trauma 30, 234–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Govsa F, Ozer MA, Biceroglu H, et al. (2018) Creation of 3-dimensional life size: patient-specific C1 fracture models for screw fixation. World Neurosurg 114, e173–e181. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tsuang F-Y, Chen C-H, Kuo Y-J, et al. (2017) Percutaneous pedicle screw placement under single dimensional fluoroscopy with a designed pedicle finder – a technical note and case series. Spine J 17(9), 1373–1380. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Elnady B, El-Sharkawi MM, El-Meshtawy M, Adam M, Said GZ (2017) Posterior-only surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an Egyptian experience. SICOT J 3, 69. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Carbone JJ, Tortolani PJ, Quartararo LG (2003) Fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw fixation for thoracic and thoracolumbar injuries: technique and short-term complications. Spine 28(1), 91–97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Allam Y, Silbermann J, Riese F, Greiner-Perth R (2013) Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine: comparison between free hand and a generic 3D-based navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 22(3), 648–653. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mirza SK, Wiggins GC, Kuntz Iv C, et al. (2003) Accuracy of thoracic vertebral body screw placement using standard fluoroscopy, fluoroscopic image guidance, and computed tomographic image guidance: a cadaver study. Spine 28(4), 402–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Castro WH, Halm H, Jerosch J, Malms J, Steinbeck J, Blasius S (1996) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine 21(11), 1320–1324. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Laine T, Schlenzka D, Mäkitalo K, Tallroth K, Nolte L-P, Visarius H (1997) Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery: a prospective clinical trial of 30 patients. Spine 22(11), 1254–1258. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lotfinia I, Sayyahmelli S, Gavami M (2010) Postoperative computed tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement accuracy. Turk Neurosurg 20(4), 500–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Aigner R, Bichlmaier C, Oberkircher L, et al. (2021) Pedicle screw accuracy in thoracolumbar fractures – is routine postoperative CT scan necessary? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1), 1–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rao G, Brodke DS, Rondina M, Dailey AT (2002) Comparison of computerized tomography and direct visualization in thoracic pedicle screw placement. J Neurosurg Spine 97(2), 223–226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vardiman AB, Wallace DJ, Booher GA, Toossi N, Bucklen BS (2023) Decreasing the pedicle screw misplacement rate in the thoracic spine with robot-guided navigation. Clin Spine Surg 36(10), 431–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Oikonomidis S, Beyer F, Meyer C, Baltin CT, Eysel P, Bredow J (2020) Insertion angle of pedicle screws in the subaxial cervical spine: the analysis of computed tomography-navigated insertion of pedicle screws. Asian Spine J 14(1), 66. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yongqi L, Dehua Z, Hongzi W, et al. (2020) Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21(1), 208. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.