EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 11 (2025) SICOT-J, 11 (2025) 55 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
Article Number 55
Number of page(s) 6
Section Foot
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025054
Published online 30 September 2025
  1. Donatto KC (1998) Arthritis and arthrodesis of the hindfoot. Clin Orthop 349, 81–92. [Google Scholar]
  2. Roster B, Kreulen C, Giza E (2015) Subtalar joint arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Clin 20, 319–334. [Google Scholar]
  3. Easley ME, Trnka H-J, Schon LC, Myerson MS (2000) Isolated subtalar arthrodesis. J Bone Jt Surg-Am 82, 613–624. [Google Scholar]
  4. Carranza-Bencano A, Tejero-García S, Del Castillo-Blanco G, et al. (2013) Isolated subtalar arthrodesis through minimal incision surgery. Foot Ankle Int 34, 1117–1127. [Google Scholar]
  5. Martín Oliva X, Falcão P, Fernandes Cerqueira R, Rodrigues-Pinto R (2017) Posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis: clinical and radiologic review of 19 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg 56, 543–546. [Google Scholar]
  6. Vilá-Rico J, Mellado-Romero MA, Bravo-Giménez B, et al. (2017) Subtalar arthroscopic arthrodesis: Technique and outcomes. Foot Ankle Surg 23, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  7. Colombier J-A, Devos Bevernage B (2015) Arthrodèses partielles du couple de torsion: sous-talienne, talonaviculaire, calcanéocuboïdienne. In: Pathologie du pied et de la cheville Elsevier, pp. 355–369. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yasui Y, Hannon CP, Seow D, Kennedy JG (2016) Ankle arthrodesis: A systematic approach and review of the literature. World J Orthop 7, 700. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Winson IG, Robinson DE, Allen PE (2005) Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87-B, 343–347. [Google Scholar]
  10. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, et al. (2007) Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Jt Surg 89, 1899–1905. [Google Scholar]
  11. Clifford C, Berg S, McCann K, Hutchinson B (2015) A biomechanical comparison of internal fixation techniques for ankle arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg 54, 188–191. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones CP, Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS (2006) Prospective CT scan evaluation of hindfoot nonunions treated with revision surgery and low-intensity ultrasound stimulation. Foot Ankle Int 27, 229–235. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, et al. (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15, 349–353. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dorsey ML, Liu PT, Roberts CC, Kile TA (2009) Correlation of arthrodesis stability with degree of joint fusion on MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 192, 496–499. [Google Scholar]
  15. Briot K, Roux C, Thomas T, et al. 2018 update of French recommendations on the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine 85, 519–530. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yoon V, Maalouf NM, Sakhaee K (2012) The effects of smoking on bone metabolism. Osteoporos Int 23, 2081–2092. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cerrato RA, Aiyer AA, Campbell J, et al. (2014) Reproducibility of computed tomography to evaluate ankle and hindfoot fusions. Foot Ankle Int 35, 1176–1180. [Google Scholar]
  18. Banerjee R, Saltzman C, Anderson RB, Nickisch F (2011) Management of calcaneal malunion. Am Acad Orthop Surg 19, 27–36. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee HS, Kim WJ, Park ES, et al. (2019) Mid-term follow-up results of calcaneal reconstruction for calcaneal malunion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20, 43. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sadek AF, Fouly EH, Soliman AM (2020) Combined subtalar distraction arthrodesis with peroneus brevis tenotomy for posttraumatic subtalar arthritis. Foot Ankle Surg 26, 687–692. [Google Scholar]
  21. Papadelis EA, Karampinas PK, Kavroudakis E, et al. (2015) Isolated subtalar distraction arthrodesis using porous tantalum: a pilot study. Foot Ankle Int 36, 1084–1088. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dana C, Péjin Z, Cadilhac C, et al. (2019) Long-term results of the “Horseman” procedure for severe idiopathic flatfoot in children: a retrospective analysis of 41 consecutive cases with mean 8.9 year duration of follow-up. J Foot Ankle Surg 58, 10–16. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lintz F, Welck M, Bernasconi A, et al. (2017) 3D biometrics for hindfoot alignment using weightbearing CT. Foot Ankle Int 38, 684–689. [Google Scholar]
  24. De Cesar Netto C, Shakoor D, Dein EJ, et al. (2019) Influence of investigator experience on reliability of adult acquired flatfoot deformity measurements using weightbearing computed tomography. Foot Ankle Surg 25, 495–502. [Google Scholar]
  25. Richter M, Lintz F, De Cesar Netto C, et al. (2020)Results of more than 11,000 scans with weightbearing CT – Impact on costs, radiation exposure, and procedure time. Foot Ankle Surg 26, 518–522. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang C, Xu X, Zhu Y, et al. (2016) A long-term study of the effect of subtalar arthrodesis on the ankle and hindfoot joints. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 106, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lavery KP, McHale KJ, Rossy WH, Theodore G (2016) Ankle impingement. J Orthop Surg 11, 97. [Google Scholar]
  28. Artioli E, Mazzotti A, Cassanelli E, et al. (2024) Impact of subtalar distraction arthrodesis on ankle joint: radiological insights from modified grice-green procedure. Life 14, 692. [Google Scholar]
  29. Steelman K, Bolz N, Feria-Arias E, Meehan R (2021) Evaluation of patient outcomes after operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures. SICOT-J, 7, 65. [Google Scholar]
  30. Carr JB, Hansen ST, Benirschke SK (1988) Subtalar distraction bone block fusion for late complications of os calcis fractures. Foot Ankle 9, 81–86. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.