EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 11 (2025) SICOT-J, 11 (2025) 22 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
Article Number 22
Number of page(s) 7
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025016
Published online 01 April 2025
  1. Graf R (1980) The diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic combound treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 97, 117–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Voitl P, Sebelefsky C, Hosner S, Woditschka A, Diesner S, Böck A (2019) Ultrasound of the infant hip: manual fixation is equivalent to Graf’s technique regarding image quality-a randomized trial. BMC Pediatr 19, 14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Graf R (1984) Classification of hip joint dysplasia by means of sonography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 102, 248–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Graf R (1997) Hip sonography. Basic principles and current aspects. Orthop 26, 14. [Google Scholar]
  5. Walter SG, Ossendorff R, Yagdiran A, Hockmann J, Bornemann R, Placzek S (2022) Four decades of developmental dysplastic hip screening according to Graf: What have we learned? Front Pediatr 10, 990806. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Norusis M (2011) IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0 guide to data analysis. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  7. Walpole RE, Myers RH, Myers SL, Ye K (2012) Probability & statistics for engineers & scientists. Ninth Ed. New York: Prentice Hall Publications. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kolovos S, Tsiotas D (2016) Ultrasonographic diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: introducing a new approach. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26, 167–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tsiotas D (2019) Detecting different topologies immanent in scale-free networks with the same degree distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116, 6701–6706. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sioutis S, Kolovos S, Papakonstantinou M-E, Reppas L, Koulalis D, Mavrogenis AF (2022) Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a review. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 32, 39–56. [Google Scholar]
  11. Govsa F, Ozer MA, Ozgur Z (2005) Morphologic features of the acetabulum. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125, 453–461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mulpuri K, Schaeffer EK, Andrade J, Sankar WN, Williams N, Matheney TH, Mubarak SJ, Cundy PJ, Price CT (2016) What risk factors and characteristics are associated with late-presenting dislocations of the hip in infants? Clin Orthop 474, 1131–1137. [Google Scholar]
  13. El-Shazly M, Trainor B, Kernohan WG, Turner I, Haugh PE, Johnston AF, Mollan RAB (1994) Reliability of the Barlow and Ortolani tests for neonatal hip instability. J Med Screen 1, 165–168. [Google Scholar]
  14. de Hundt M, Vlemmix F, Bais JMJ, Hutton EK, de Groot CJ, Mol BWJ, Kok M (2012) Risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 165, 8–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Riboni G, Bellini A, Serantoni S, Rognoni E, Bisanti L (2003) Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pediatr Radiol 33, 475–481. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nandhagopal T, Tiwari V, De Cicco FL (2025) Developmental dysplasia of the hip. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563157/. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gillingham BL, Sanchez AA, Wenger DR (1999) Pelvic osteotomies for the treatment of hip dysplasia in children and young adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7, 325–337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Omeroğlu H, Koparal S (2001) The role of clinical examination and risk factors in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a prospective study in 188 referred young infants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121, 7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schams M, Labruyère R, Zuse A, Walensi M (2017) Diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip using the Graf ultrasound method: risk and protective factor analysis in 11, 820 universally screened newborns. Eur J Pediatr 176, 1193–1200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Suzuki S, Awaya G, Wakita S, Maekawa M, Ikeda T (1987) Diagnosis by ultrasound of congenital dislocation of the hip joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 217, 171–178. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wako M, Kono H, Koyama K, Fujimaki T, Furuya N, Haro H (2022) The anatomical position of Graf’s standard plane and its relationship with pelvic morphology: a computed tomography-based study. Cureus 14, e27424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Graf R (2017) Hip sonography: background; technique and common mistakes; results; debate and politics; challenges. Hip Int 27 (3), 215–219. [Google Scholar]
  23. Graf R, Mohajer M, Plattner F (2013) Hip sonography update. Quality-management, catastrophes – tips and tricks. Med Ultrason 15(4), 299–303. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ömeroğlu H (2021) Significant assessment discrepancies occur between the examiners having and not having further special hands-on course trainings in infantile hip ultrasonography by the Graf method. Indian J Orthop 55(6), 1523–1528. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chavoshi M, Mirshahvalad SA, Mahdizadeh M, Zamani F (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography method of Graf in the detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Arch Bone Jt Surg 9(3), 297–305. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gokharman FD, Aydin S, Fatihoglu E, Ergun E, Kosar PN (2019) Optimizing the time for developmental dysplasia of the hip screening: earlier or later? Ultrasound Q 35(2), 130–135. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jacobino BCP, Galvão MD, da Silva AF, de Castro CC (2012) Using the Graf method of ultrasound examination to classify hip dysplasia in neonates. Autops Case Rep. 2(2), 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hell AK, Becker JC, Rühmann O, Lewinski GV, Lazovic D (2008) Inter- und intraindividuelle Messabweichungen in der Säuglingshüftsonografie nach Graf [Inter- and intraobserver reliability in Graf’s sonographic hip examination]. Z Orthop Unfall 146(5), 624–629 (German). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.