EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 11 (2025) SICOT-J, 11 (2025) 33 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
Article Number 33
Number of page(s) 6
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025018
Published online 06 June 2025
  1. Laskin RS, Maruyama Y, Villaneuva M, Bourne R (2000) Deep-dish congruent tibial component use in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200011000-00006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shatrov J, Sappey-Marinier E, Kafelov M, et al. (2022) Similar outcomes including maximum knee flexion between mobile bearing condylar-stabilised and fixed bearing posterior-stabilised prosthesis: a case control study. J Exp Orthop 9, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00456-0. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Stirling P, Clement ND, MacDonald D, et al. (2019) Early functional outcomes after condylar-stabilizing (deep-dish) versus standard bearing surface for cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 31, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-019-0001-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Stadler C, Hofstätter M, Luger M, et al. (2023) No component loosening of a cementless deep dish rotating platform knee at a 5-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 969–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07113-0. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MacDessi SJ, Oussedik S, Abdel MP, et al. (2023) The language of knee alignment: updated definitions and considerations for reporting outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 105-B, 101. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.105B2.BJJ-2023-00028. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Howell SM, Shelton TJ, Hull ML (2018) Implant survival and function ten years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33, 3678–3684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.020. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sterneder CM, Faschingbauer M, Haralambiev L, et al. (2024) Why kinematic alignment makes little sense in valgus osteoarthritis of the knee: a narrative review. J Clin Med 13, 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13051302. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown NM, Lingampalli N, Hellman MD (2024) Intraoperative challenges of the kinematic knee. Orthop Clin North Am 55, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2023.07.001. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Courtney PM, Lee G-C (2017) Early outcomes of kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of the literature. J Arthroplasty 32, 2028–2032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.041. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blakeney WG, Vendittoli P-A (2020) Restricted kinematic alignment: the ideal compromise? In: Personalized hip and knee joint replacement. Rivière C, Vendittoli P-A, EditorsCham (CH), Springer. [Google Scholar]
  11. Vendittoli P-A, Martinov S, Blakeney WG (2021) Restricted kinematic alignment, the fundamentals, and clinical applications. Front Surg 8, 697020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.697020. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Devane PA, Horne JG (1999) Assessment of polyethylene wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369, 59–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Charnley J (1972) The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 54, 61–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Debette C, Parratte S, Maucort-Boulch D, et al. (2014) French adaptation of the new Knee Society Scoring System for total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100, 531–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.025. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, et al. (2018) The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplasty 33, 1309–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Healy WL, Della Valle CJ, Iorio R, et al. (2013) Complications of total knee arthroplasty: standardized list and definitions of the Knee Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2489-y. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Putman S, Boureau F, Girard J, et al. (2019) Patellar complications after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105, S43–S51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.028. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Khow YZ, Liow MHL, Goh GS, et al. (2022) Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the knee society score following revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 2744–2752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06628-2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Czekaj J, Fary C, Gaillard T, Lustig S (2017) Does low-constraint mobile bearing knee prosthesis give satisfactory results for severe coronal deformities? A five to twelve year follow up study. Int Orthop 41, 1369–1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3452-z. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lefèvre M, Cavailhès J, Ferri C, et al. (2022) CORIN KneeTec DeepDishTM: functional outcomes after a follow-up of 12 months and comparison with the STRYKER Triathlon PS. Acta Orthop Belg 88, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.52628/88.1.09. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Machhindra MV, Kang JY, Kang YG, et al. (2015) Functional outcomes of a new mobile-bearing ultra-congruent TKA system: comparison with the posterior stabilized system. J Arthroplasty 30, 2137–2142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.011. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Singh M, Harary J, Schilling PL, Moschetti WE (2024) Patient satisfaction is nearly 90% after total knee arthroplasty; we are better than we were. J Arthroplasty 40, P1521–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.038. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, et al. (2019) Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 1394–1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05509-z. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pangaud C, Siboni R, Gonzalez J-F, et al. (2024) Restoring the preoperative phenotype according to the coronal plane alignment of the knee classification after total knee arthroplasty leads to better functional results. J Arthroplasty 39, 2970–2976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.012. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hao D, Wang J (2021) Fixed-bearing vs mobile-bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty after approximately 10 years of follow-up: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 437. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02560-w. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.