Open Access
| Issue |
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 34 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Knee | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025028 | |
| Published online | 11 June 2025 | |
- Achakri H, Ben-Shlomo Y, Blom A, et al. (2022) The National Joint Registry 20th Annual Report 2023. London: National Joint Registry. [Google Scholar]
- Sangaletti R, Meschini C, Capece G, et al. (2024) A morphometric medial compartment-specific unicompartmental knee system: 5 years follow up results from a pilot center. Knee 47, 179–185. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foissey C, Batailler C, Fontalis A, et al. (2024) Long-term outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Survivorship of medial versus lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J ISAKOS 9, 100329. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andriollo L, Benazzo F, Cinelli V, et al. (2024) The use of an imageless robotic system in revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33(5), 1792–1803. [Google Scholar]
- Foissey C, Batailler C, Vahabi A, et al. (2023) Combination of a high residual varus and joint-line lowering strongly increases the risk of early implant failure in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 38, 2275–2281. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gaggiotti S, Foissey C, Pineda T, et al. (2024) Enhancing robotic precision in medial UKA: Image-based robot-assisted system had higher accuracy in implant positioning than imageless robot-assisted system across 292 knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 32, 2097–2106. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andriollo L, Montagna A, Mazzella GG, et al. (2024) Navigated versus conventional medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Minimum 18 years clinical outcomes and survivorship of the original Cartier design. Knee 49, 183–191. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cartier P, Sanouiller J-L, Grelsamer RP (1996) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery: 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 11, 782–788. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rivière C, Logishetty K, Villet L, Maillot C (2021) Calipered kinematic alignment technique for implanting a Medial Oxford®: A technical note. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 107, 102859. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Batailler C, Libert T, Oussedik S, et al. (2024) Patello-femoral arthroplasty- indications and contraindications. J ISAKOS 9, 822–828. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koutserimpas C, Andriollo L, Gregori P, et al. (2025) Revisiting terminology: The transition from “functional alignment” to “functional knee positioning”. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12667. [Google Scholar]
- Andriollo L, Koutserimpas C, Gregori P, et al. (2025) A new parameter in the era of robotic total knee arthroplasty: Coronal alignment at 90 of flexion impacts clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12648. [Google Scholar]
- Andriollo L, Koutserimpas C, Gregori P, et al. (2025) Beyond the coronal plane in robotic total knee arthroplasty-Part 1: Variations in tibial slope and distal femoral flexion do not affect outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12658. [Google Scholar]
- Andriollo L, Gregori P, Koutserimpas C, et al. (2025) Beyond the coronal plane in robotic total knee arthroplasty-Part 2: Combined flexion does not affect outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12660. [Google Scholar]
- Jiao X, Du M, Li Q, et al. (2024) Does patient-specific instrument or robot improve imaging and functional outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A Bayesian analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144, 4827–4838. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.