EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 11 (2025) SICOT-J, 11 (2025) 40 References
Open Access
Review
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
Article Number 40
Number of page(s) 8
Section Spine
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025035
Published online 16 July 2025
  1. Vuillemin N, Pape H-C, Rommens PM, et al. (2021) A bibliometric analysis of fragility fractures: top 50. Medicina (Kaunas) 57, 639. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexandru D, So W (2012) Evaluation and management of vertebral compression fractures. Perm J 16, 46–51. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beall D, Lorio MP, Yun BM, et al. (2018) Review of vertebral augmentation: an updated meta-analysis of the effectiveness. Int J Spine Surg 12, 295–321. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rutenberg TF, Hershkovitz A, Jabareen R, et al. (2023) Can nutritional and inflammatory indices predict 90-day mortality in fragility hip fracture patients? SICOT J 9, 30. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li Y, Yan L, Cai S, et al. (2018) The prevalence and under-diagnosis of vertebral fractures on chest radiograph. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19, 235. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bottai V, Giannotti S, Raffaetà G, et al. (2016) Underdiagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in patients with fragility fractures: retrospective analysis of over 300 patients. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 13, 119–122. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fink HA, Milavetz DL, Palermo L, et al. (2005) What proportion of incident radiographic vertebral deformities is clinically diagnosed and vice versa? J Bone Miner Res 20, 1216–1222. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ballane G, Cauley JA, Luckey MM, El-Hajj Fuleihan G (2017) Worldwide prevalence and incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 28, 1531–1542. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kanis JA, Norton N, Harvey NC, et al. (2021) SCOPE 2021: a new scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe. Arch Osteoporos 16, 82. [Google Scholar]
  10. Paniker J, Graham SM, Harrison JW (2015) Global trauma: the great divide, SICOT J 1, 19. [Google Scholar]
  11. Eastell R, Cedel SL, Wahner HW, et al. (1991) Classification of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 6, 207–215. [Google Scholar]
  12. McCloskey EV, Spector TD, Eyres KS, et al. (1993) The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials. Osteoporos Int 3, 138–147. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sugita M, Watanabe N, Mikami Y, et al. (2005) Classification of vertebral compression fractures in the osteoporotic spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 18, 376–381. [Google Scholar]
  14. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8, 1137–1148. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schnake KJ, Blattert TR, Hahn P, et al. (2018) Classification of osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine fractures: recommendations of the spine section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU). Global Spine J 8, 46S–49S. [Google Scholar]
  16. López Zúñiga D, Láinez-Ramos-Bossini AJ, Ruiz Santiago F (2022) Radiographic diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. An updated review. Med Clin (Barc) 158, 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yeung Y-K, Ho S-T (2017) Delayed neurological deficits after osteoporotic vertebral fractures: clinical outcomes after surgery. Asian Spine J 11, 981–988. [Google Scholar]
  18. McGowan SM, Ramski DE, Homcha B, Sokunbi G (2019) Are CT scans overutilized in the workup of vertebral compression fractures? Clin Spine Surg 32, 166–169. [Google Scholar]
  19. Miao KH, Miao JH, Belani P, et al. (2024) Radiological diagnosis and advances in imaging of vertebral compression fractures. J Imaging 10, 244. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhao Q-M, Gu X-F, Liu Z-T, Cheng L (2016) The value of radionuclide bone imaging in defining fresh fractures among osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Craniofac Surg 27, 745–748. [Google Scholar]
  21. Musbahi O, Ali AM, Hassany H, Mobasheri R (2018) Vertebral compression fractures. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 79, 36–40. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gx L, Lw S, Sw J, et al. (2021) A pilot study of radiculopathy following osteoporotic vertebral fracture in elderly patients: an algorithmic approach to surgical management. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 12, 21514593211044912. [Google Scholar]
  23. Madassery S (2020) Vertebral compression fractures: evaluation and management. Semin Intervent Radiol 37, 214–219. [Google Scholar]
  24. Suzuki N, Ogikubo O, Hansson T (2008) The course of the acute vertebral body fragility fracture: its effect on pain, disability and quality of life during 12 months. Eur Spine J 17, 1380–1390. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wong CC, McGirt MJ (2013) Vertebral compression fractures: a review of current management and multimodal therapy. J Multidiscip Healthc 6, 205–214. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kweh BTS, Lee HQ, Tan T, et al. (2021) The role of spinal orthoses in osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the elderly population (age 60 years or older): systematic review. Global Spine J 11, 975–987. [Google Scholar]
  27. Prather H, Watson JO, Gilula LA (2007) Nonoperative management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Injury 38(Suppl 3), S40–S48. [Google Scholar]
  28. Tuong NH, Dansereau J, Maurais G, Herrera R (1998) Three-dimensional evaluation of lumbar orthosis effects on spinal behavior. J Rehabil Res Dev 35, 34–42. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sinaki M, Itoi M, Wahner HW, Wollan P, Gelzcer R, Mullan BP, Collins DA, Hodgson SF (2002) Stronger back muscles reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures: a prospective 10 year follow-up of postmenopausal women. Bone 30(6) 836–841. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sinaki M, Brey RH, Hughes CA, et al. (2005) Significant reduction in risk of falls and back pain in osteoporotic-kyphotic women through a Spinal Proprioceptive Extension Exercise Dynamic (SPEED) program. Mayo Clin Proc 80, 849–855. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gibbs JC, MacIntyre NJ, Ponzano NJ, et al. (2019) Exercise for improving outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019, CD008618. [Google Scholar]
  32. Khan M, Kushchayev SV (2019) Percutaneous vertebral body augmentations: the state of art. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 29, 495–513. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sahota O, Ong T, Salem K (2018) Vertebral fragility fractures (VFF) – who, when and how to operate. Injury 49, 1430–1435. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sulpis B, Neri T, Klasan A, et al. (2024) Isolated posterior stabilization in type B and C thoracolumbar fractures associated with ankylosing spine disorders: a single center experience with clinical and radiological outcomes. SICOT J 10, 26. [Google Scholar]
  35. Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet F, et al. (1996) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology 200, 525–530. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hadjipavlou A, Tosounidis T, Gaitanis T, et al. (2007) Balloon kyphoplasty as a single or as an adjunct procedure for the management of symptomatic vertebral haemangiomas. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89, 495–502. [Google Scholar]
  37. Jay B, Ahn SH (2013) Vertebroplasty. Semin Intervent Radiol 30, 297–306. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tsoumakidou G, Too CW, Koch CW, et al. (2017) CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40, 331–342. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nieuwenhuijse MJ, van Erkel AR, Dijkstra PDS (2012) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for subacute and chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures can safely be undertaken in the first year after the onset of symptoms. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94, 815–820. [Google Scholar]
  40. Robinson Y, Heyde CE, Försth P, Olerud C (2011) Kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures–guidelines and technical considerations. J Orthop Surg Res 6, 43. [Google Scholar]
  41. Katsanos K, Sabharwal T, Adam A (2010) Percutaneous cementoplasty. Semin Intervent Radiol 27, 137–147. [Google Scholar]
  42. Boszczyk B (2010) Volume matters: a review of procedural details of two randomised controlled vertebroplasty trials of 2009. Eur Spine J 19, 1837–1840. [Google Scholar]
  43. Halvachizadeh S, Stalder A-L, Bellut D, et al. (2021) Systematic review and meta-analysis of 3 treatment arms for vertebral compression fractures: a comparison of improvement in pain, adjacent-level fractures, and quality of life between vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and nonoperative management. JBJS Rev 9, e21.00045. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hinde K, Maingard J, Hirsch JA, et al. (2020) Mortality outcomes of vertebral augmentation (vertebroplasty and/or balloon kyphoplasty) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 295, 96–103. [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu JT, Liao WJ, Tan WC, et al. (2010) Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study. Osteoporos Int 21, 359–364. [Google Scholar]
  46. Dohm M, Black CM, Dacre A, et al. (2014) A randomized trial comparing balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis. Am J Neuroradiol 35, 2227–2236. [Google Scholar]
  47. Evans AJ, Kip KE, Brinjikji W, et al. (2016) Randomized controlled trial of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. J Neurointerv Surg 8, 756–763. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chandra RV, Yoo AJ, Hirsch JA (2013) Vertebral augmentation: update on safety, efficacy, cost effectiveness and increased survival? Pain Physician 16, 309–320. [Google Scholar]
  49. Marcia S, Muto M, Hirsch JA, et al. (2018) What is the role of vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic fractures? A review of the recent literature. Neuroradiology 60, 777–783. [Google Scholar]
  50. Svedbom A, Alvares L, Cooper C, et al. (2013) Balloon kyphoplasty compared to vertebroplasty and nonsurgical management in patients hospitalised with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a UK cost-effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 24, 355–367. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hopkins TJ, Eggington S, Quinn M, Nichols-Ricker CI (2020) Cost-effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty versus conservative medical management in the USA. Osteoporos Int 31, 2461–2471. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pron G, Hwang M, Smith R, et al. (2022) Cost-effectiveness studies of vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review. Spine J 22, 1356–1371. [Google Scholar]
  53. Masala S, Ciarrapico AM, Konda D, et al. (2008) Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Eur Spine J 17, 1242–1250. [Google Scholar]
  54. Fritzell P, Ohlin A, Borgström F (2011) Cost-effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty versus standard medical treatment in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a Swedish multicenter randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine 36, 2243–2251. [Google Scholar]
  55. Bornemann R, Jansen TR, Kabir K, et al. (2017) Comparison of radiofrequency-targeted vertebral augmentation with balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: 2-year results. Clin Spine Surg 30, E247–E251. [Google Scholar]
  56. Georgy BA (2013) Comparison between radiofrequency targeted vertebral augmentation and balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: addressing factors that affect cement extravasation and distribution. Pain Physician 16, E513–518. [Google Scholar]
  57. Gandham S, Islim A, Alhamad S, Thambiraj S (2021) The outcome of expandable titanium mesh implants for the treatment of multi-level vertebral compression fractures caused by multiple myeloma. SICOT J 7, 28. [Google Scholar]
  58. Korovessis P, Vardakastanis K, Repantis T, Vitsas V (2013) Balloon kyphoplasty versus KIVA vertebral augmentation – comparison of 2 techniques for osteoporotic vertebral body fractures: a prospective randomized study. Spine 38, 292–299. [Google Scholar]
  59. Baeesa SS, Krueger A, Aragón FA, Noriega DC (2015) The efficacy of a percutaneous expandable titanium device in anatomical reduction of vertebral compression fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Saudi Med J 36, 52–60. [Google Scholar]
  60. Matzkin EG, DeMaio M, Charles JF, Franklin CC (2019) Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis: what orthopaedic surgeons need to know. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27, e902–e912. [Google Scholar]
  61. Ellanti P, Mohan K, Moriarity A, et al. (2017) Canal to diaphysis ratio as a risk factor for hip fractures and hip fracture pattern. SICOT J 3, 64. [Google Scholar]
  62. Johansson H, Siggeirsdóttir K, Harvey NC, et al. (2017) Imminent risk of fracture after fracture. Osteoporos Int 28, 775–780. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, et al. (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285, 320–323. [Google Scholar]
  64. Marie-Hardy L, Barut N, Sari Ali H, et al. (2020) Evaluation of disc degeneration adjacent to AOspine A fractures: pre- and post-operative MRI analysis. SICOT J 6, 33. [Google Scholar]
  65. Hanschen M, Pesch S, Huber-Wagner S, Biberthaler P (2017) Management of acetabular fractures in the geriatric patient. SICOT J 3, 37. [Google Scholar]
  66. Latz D, Schiffner E, Koukos C, et al. (2024) Fractures of the proximal femur and hip osteoarthrosis – coincidence or coherence? SICOT J 10, 29. [Google Scholar]
  67. Barton DW, Behrend CJ, Carmouche JJ (2019) Rates of osteoporosis screening and treatment following vertebral fracture. Spine J 19, 411–417. [Google Scholar]
  68. Jin Y-Z, Lee JH, Xu B, Cho M (2019) Effect of medications on prevention of secondary osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, non-vertebral fracture, and discontinuation due to adverse events: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20, 399. [Google Scholar]
  69. Mills ES, Hah RJ, Fresquez Z, et al. (2022) Secondary fracture rate after vertebral osteoporotic compression fracture is decreased by anti-osteoporotic medication but not increased by cement augmentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 104, 2178–2185. [Google Scholar]
  70. Daskalakis II, Kritsotakis EI, Karantanas AH, et al. (2024) Application of an in-hospital, surgeon-led anti-osteoporotic medication algorithm in patients with hip fractures improves persistence to medication and can prevent the second fragility fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144, 683–692. [Google Scholar]
  71. Gosch M, Kammerlander C, Roth T, et al. (2013) Surgeons save bones: an algorithm for orthopedic surgeons managing secondary fracture prevention. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar]
  72. Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ, et al. (2013) Capture the fracture: a best practice framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int 24, 2135–2152. [Google Scholar]
  73. Chami G, Jeys L, Freudmann M, et al. (2006) Are osteoporotic fractures being adequately investigated? A questionnaire of GP & orthopaedic surgeons. BMC Fam Pract 7, 7. [Google Scholar]
  74. Jackson A, Wasfie T, Brock C, et al. (2020) Fragility vertebral compression fractures in postmenopausal women: the role of a fracture liaison service program. Am Surg 86, 1636–1639. [Google Scholar]
  75. Wu C-H, Kao I-J, Hung W-C, et al. (2018) Economic impact and cost-effectiveness of fracture liaison services: a systematic review of the literature. Osteoporos Int 29, 1227–1242. [Google Scholar]
  76. FFN. Available at https://www.fragilityfracturenetwork.org/. Accessed 27 January, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  77. Danazumi MS, Lightbody N, Dermody G (2024) Effectiveness of fracture liaison service in reducing the risk of secondary fragility fractures in adults aged 50 and older: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 35, 1133–1151. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.