EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 11 (2025) SICOT-J, 11 (2025) 53 References
Open Access
Review
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
Article Number 53
Number of page(s) 10
Section Spine
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025050
Published online 19 September 2025
  1. Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R (2013) Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, J Child Orthop 7, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim H, Kim HS, Moon ES, et al. (2010) Scoliosis imaging: What Radiologists should know. Radiographics 30, 42. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bettany-Saltikov J, Weiss HR, Chockalingam N, et al. (2015) Surgical versus non-surgical interventions in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 4, 7–8. [Google Scholar]
  4. Freidel K, Petermann F, Reichel D, Steiner A, Warschburger P, Weiss HR (2002) Quality of life in women with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27, 87–91. [Google Scholar]
  5. Feng G, Huang Y, Huang L, et al. (2021) A novel posterior multiple screws distraction reducer system versus anterior release, posterior internal distraction, and subsequent spinal fusion for severe scoliosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22, 144. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li N, Xu C, Shen MK, Luo M, Wang J, Xia L (2018) Clinical outcomes of posterior pedicle screw instrumentation without osteotomy in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Medicine (United States) 97, 36. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bazin L, Ansorge A, Vendeuvre T, et al. (2023) Minimally invasive surgery for posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Current status and future application. Children 10, 12. [Google Scholar]
  8. Badin D, Gupta A, Skaggs DL, Sponseller PD (2023) Temporary internal distraction for severe scoliosis: two-year minimum follow-up. Spine Deform 11, 341–350. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li M, Ni J, Li Y, et al. (2009) Single-staged anterior and posterior spinal fusion: A safe and effective alternative for severe and rigid adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in China. J Paediatr Child Health 45, 21–25. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shen J, Qiu G, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Zhao Y (2006) Comparison of 1-stage versus 2-stage anterior and posterior spinal fusion for severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis – A randomized prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31, 2525–2528. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hamzaoglu A, Ozturk C, Aydogan M, Tezer M, Aksu N, Bruno MB (2008) Posterior only pedicle screw instrumentation with intraoperative halo-femoral traction in the surgical treatment of severe scoliosis (>100°). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 3, 979–983. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zheng CK, Kan WS, Li P, Zhao ZG, Li K (2013) Treatment for severe idiopathic upper thoracic scoliosis in adolescence. J Spinal Disord Tech 26, 107–111. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ren C, Liu L, Song Y, Zhou C, Liu H, Li T (2014) Comparison of anterior and posterior vertebral column resection versus anterior release with posterior internal distraction for severe and rigid scoliosis. Eur Spine J 23, 1194–1203. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mihara Y, Chung WH, Chiu CK, et al. (2020) Perioperative outcome of severe idiopathic scoliosis (Cobb angle ≥ 90°): Is there any difference between “daytime” versus “after-hours” surgeries? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45, 1085–1091. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mirzashahi B, Moosavi M, Rostami M (2020) Outcome of posterior-only approach for severe rigid scoliosis: A retrospective report. Int J Spine Surg 14, 100–105. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chan CYW, Chung WH, Mihara Y, et al. (2020) Perioperative outcome of severe rigid idiopathic scoliosis: Single-staged posterior spinal fusion utilizing a dual attending surgeon strategy. A report of 41 patients. J Orthop Surg 28, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  17. Grabala P, Helenius IJ (2020) Clinical and radiological outcomes of less invasive temporary internal distraction followed by staged pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescents with severe idiopathic scoliosis at 2-year minimum follow-up. World Neurosurg 143, 32–39. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gatam L, Luthfi APWY, Fachrisal Phedy, Gatam AR, Djaja YP (2020) A posterior-only approach for treatment of severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with pedicle screw fixation: A case series. Int J Surg Case Rep 77, 768–772. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chan CYW, Lee SY, Ch’Ng PY, et al. (2021) Learning curve for a dual attending surgeon strategy in Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF): An analysis of 105 severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (Cobb angle ≥ 90°). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 46, 1056–1062. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mihara Y, Chung WH, Mohamad SM, Chiu CK, Chan CYW, Kwan MK (2021) Predictive factors for correction rate in severe idiopathic scoliosis (Cobb angle ≥ 90°): an analysis of 128 patients. European Spine Journal 30, 1338–1345. [Google Scholar]
  21. Stone LE, Newton PO, Catanzano AA, et al. (2024) Severe (>100 degrees) thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis – a comparison of surgical approaches. Global Spine J 15, 1773–1782. [Google Scholar]
  22. Grabala P, Galgano MA, Grabala M, Buchowski JM (2024) Radiological and pulmonary results of surgical treatment of severe idiopathic scoliosis using preoperative halo gravity traction compared with less invasive temporary internal distraction in staged surgery in adolescents. J Clin Med 13, 2875. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chandirasegaran S, Chan CYW, Chiu CK, Mohamad SM, Hasan MS, Kwan MK (2025) Enhancing recovery in severe Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients with Cobb angle ≥ 90 degrees undergoing single-staged Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF). Clin Spine Surg 15, 20–28. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang Y, Tao L, Hai Y, et al. (2019) One-stage posterior multiple-level asymmetrical ponte osteotomies versus single-level posterior vertebral column resection for severe and rigid adult idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 2-year follow-up comparative study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44, 884–893. [Google Scholar]
  25. Di Silvestre M, Zanirato A, Greggi T, et al. (2020) Severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior staged correction using a temporary magnetically-controlled growing rod. Eur Spine J 29, 2583–2590. [Google Scholar]
  26. Koller H, Mayer M, Koller J, et al. (2021) Temporary treatment with magnetically controlled growing rod for surgical correction of severe adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis greater than 100°. Eur Spine J 30, 456–466. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhou C, Liu L, Song Y, et al. (2011) Anterior and posterior vertebral column resection for severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 20, 1699–1705. [Google Scholar]
  28. Modi HN, Suh SW, Hong JY, Yang JH (2011) Posterior multilevel vertebral osteotomy for severe and rigid idiopathic and nonidiopathic kyphoscoliosis: A further experience with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36, 132–140. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li Z, Lei F, Xiu P, et al. (2019) Surgical treatment for severe and rigid scoliosis: a case-matched study between idiopathic scoliosis and syringomyelia-associated scoliosis. Spine J 19, 621–628. [Google Scholar]
  30. Song Z, Zhang Z, Yang X, et al. (2022) Posterior vertebral column resection for severe spinal deformity correction: comparison of pediatric, adolescent, and adult groups. Comput Intell Neurosci 2022, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  31. Coe JD, Arlet V, Donaldson W, et al. (2006) Complications in spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the new millennium. A report of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31, 345–349. [Google Scholar]
  32. Stone LE, Newton PO, Catanzano AA, et al. (2025) Severe (>100 degrees) thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis – a comparison of surgical approaches. Global Spine J 15, 1773–1782. [Google Scholar]
  33. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Luhmann SJ, Bridwell KH (2006) Anterior/posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90°. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31, 2386–2391. [Google Scholar]
  34. Traversari M, Ruffilli A, Barile F, et al. (2022) Surgical treatment of severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis through one-stage posterior-only approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 13, 270–276. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kandwal P, Vijayaraghavan GP, Nagaraja UB, Jayaswal A (2017) Severe rigid scoliosis: Review of management strategies and role of spinal osteotomies. Asian Spine J 11, 494–503. [Google Scholar]
  36. Xie JM, Zhang Y, Wang YS, et al. (2014) The risk factors of neurologic deficits of one-stage posterior vertebral column resection for patients with severe and rigid spinal deformities. Eur Spine J 23, 149–156. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nakdhamabhorn S, Pillai BM, Chotivichit A, Suthakorn J (2014) Sensorless based haptic feedback integration in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion for lumbar spine surgery: a preliminary cadaveric study. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 24, 420–433. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pizones J, Sánchez-Mariscal F, Zúñiga L, Izquierdo E (2015) Ponte osteotomies to treat major thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves allow more effective corrective maneuvers. Eur Spine J 24, 1524–1531. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yang C, Zheng Z, Liu H, Wang J, Kim YJ, Cho S (2016) Posterior vertebral column resection in spinal deformity: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 25, 2368–2375. [Google Scholar]
  40. Newton PO, Shea KG, Granlund KF (2000) Defining the pediatric spinal thoracoscopy learning curve: Sixty-five consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25, 1028–1034. [Google Scholar]
  41. Geck MJ, Macagno A, Ponte A, Shufflebarger HL (2007) The Ponte procedure: Posterior only treatment of Scheuermann’s kyphosis using segmental posterior shortening and pedicle screw instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 20, 586–593. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hu Z, Zhong R, Zhao D, et al. (2023) Staged osteotomy in lateral position for the treatment of severe kyphotic deformity secondary to ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 327. [Google Scholar]
  43. Faldini C, Viroli G, Traversari M, et al. (2024) Ponte osteotomies in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Children 11, 285. [Google Scholar]
  44. Payne WK, Ogilvie JW, Resnick MD, Kane RL, Transfeldt EE, Blum RW (1997) Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender make a difference? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22, 1380–1384. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tsutsui S, Pawelek J, Bastrom T, et al. (2009) Dissecting the effects of spinal fusion and deformity magnitude on quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34, 734–738. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cheshire J, Gardner A, Berryman F, Pynsent P (2017) Do the SRS-22 self-image and mental health domain scores reflect the degree of asymmetry of the back in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Scoliosis Spinal Disord 12, 19. [Google Scholar]
  47. Weinstein SL, Zavala DC, Ponseti IV (1981) Analysis of pulmonary function and chest cage dimension changes after thoracoplasty in idiopathic scoliosis. Bone Joint Surg Am 63, 857–861. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lenke LG, Newton PO, Sucato DJ, et al. (2013) Complications after 147 consecutive vertebral column resections for severe pediatric spinal deformity: A multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38, 119–132. [Google Scholar]
  49. Saifi C, Laratta JL, Petridis P, Shillingford JN, Lehman RA, Lenke LG (2017) Vertebral column resection for rigid spinal deformity. Global Spine J 7, 280–290. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.