Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
Article Number 52
Number of page(s) 5
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025040
Published online 04 September 2025
  1. Dejour D, Saffarini M, Malemo Y, et al. (2019) Early outcomes of an anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty: patient selection is key. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 2297–2302. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Batailler C, Putzeys P, Lacaze F, et al. (2023) Patellofemoral arthroplasty is an efficient strategy for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis with or without robotic-assisted system. J Pers Med 13, 625. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Deckey DG, Rosenow CS, Verhey JT, et al. (2021) Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves accuracy and precision compared to conventional techniques, Bone Joint J 103-B, 74–80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andriollo L, Benazzo F, Cinelli V, Sangaletti R, Velluto C, Rossi SMP (2025) The use of an imageless robotic system in revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 33(5), 1792–1803. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Andriollo L, Koutserimpas C, Gregori P, et al. (2025) Functional positioning in robotic patello-femoral arthroplasty: a step-by-step technique. SICOT-J 11, 35. [Google Scholar]
  6. Koutserimpas C, Andriollo L, Gregori P, Zambianchi F, Tsiridis E, Catani F, Lustig S (2025) Revisiting terminology: The transition from “functional alignment” to “functional knee positioning”. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33(6), 1948–1953. [Google Scholar]
  7. Andriollo L, Mazzella GG, Koutserimpas C, et al. (2025) Functional positioning in robotic medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a step-by-step technique. SICOT J 11, 34. [Google Scholar]
  8. Batailler C, Libert T, Oussedik S, et al. (2024) Patello-femoral arthroplasty – indications and contraindications, J ISAKOS 9, 822–828. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Andriollo L, Montagna A, Mazzella GG, et al. (2024) Navigated versus conventional medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: minimum 18 years clinical outcomes and survivorship of the original cartier design. Knee 49, 183–191. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sangaletti R, Andriollo L, Montagna A, et al. (2024) Lateral UKA can be a safe solution in a young patients’ population: a 10-year follow-up report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144, 4029–4035. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kafelov M, Batailler C, Servien E, Lustig S (2025) Restoration of the anterior compartment after robotic total knee arthroplasty significantly improves functional outcome and range of motion at 1 year, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33, 319–328. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Koutserimpas C, Saffarini M, Bonnin M, et al. (2025) Optimizing the patellofemoral compartment in total knee arthroplasty: Is it time for dynamic assessment? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33, 387–392. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Andriollo L, Koutserimpas C, Gregori P, Servien E, Batailler C, Lustig S (2025) A new parameter in the era of robotic total knee arthroplasty: Coronal alignment at 90 of flexion impacts clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33(7), 2581–2591. [Google Scholar]
  14. Andriollo L, Koutserimpas C, Gregori P, Servien E, Batailler C, Lustig S. (2025) Beyond the coronal plane in robotic total knee arthroplasty – Part 1: variations in tibial slope and distal femoral flexion do not affect outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33(8), 2928–2938. [Google Scholar]
  15. Andriollo L, Gregori P, Koutserimpas C, Servien E, Batailler C, Lustig S (2025) Beyond the coronal plane in robotic total knee arthroplasty – Part 2: combined flexion does not affect outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 33(8), 2939–2949. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.