Open Access
| Issue |
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 48 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Hip | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025049 | |
| Published online | 26 August 2025 | |
- Badarudeen S, Shu AC, Ong KL, Baykal D, Lau E, Malkani AL (2017) Complications after revision total hip arthroplasty in the medicare population. J Arthroplasty 32(6), 1954–1958. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shichman I, Roof M, Askew N, Nherera L, Rozell JC, Seyler TM, Schwarzkopf R (2023) Projections and epidemiology of primary hip and knee arthroplasty in medicare patients to 2040–2060. JB JS Open Access 8(1), e2200112. [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL Jr. (2020) Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 35(S6), S79–S85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, O’Rourke MR (2006) Managing bone loss in acetabular revision. Instr Course Lect 55, 287–297. [Google Scholar]
- Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9(1), 33–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szczepanski JR, Perriman DM, Smith PN (2019) Surgical treatment of pelvic discontinuity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBJS Rev 7(9), e4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chiarlone F, Zanirato A, Cavagnaro L, Alessio-Mazzola M, Felli L, Burastero G (2020) Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140(3), 415–424. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Laura A, Henckel J, Hart A (2023) Custom 3D-printed implants for acetabular reconstruction: intermediate-term functional and radiographic results. JB JS Open Access 8(2), e2200120. [Google Scholar]
- Wegrzyn J, Tebaa E, Jacquel A, Carret JP, Béjui-Hugues J, Pibarot V (2015) Can dual mobility cups prevent dislocation in all situations after revision total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 30(4), 631–640. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ciolli G, Mesnard G, Deroche E, Gunst S, Batailler C, Servien E, Lustig S (2022) Is cemented dual-mobility cup a reliable option in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Pers Med 13(1), 81. [Google Scholar]
- Pandey AK, Zuke WA, Surace P, Kamath AF (2023) Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip replacement: a narrative literature review. Ann Jt 9, 21. [Google Scholar]
- De Martino I, Strigelli V, Cacciola G, Gu A, Bostrom MP, Sculco PK (2019) Survivorship and clinical outcomes of custom triflange acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty 34(10), 2511–2518. [Google Scholar]
- Tikhilov RM, Dzhavadov AA, Kovalenko AN, Bilyk SS, Denisov AO, Shubnyakov II (2022) Standard versus custom-made acetabular implants in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 37(1) 119–125. [Google Scholar]
- Myncke I, van Schaik D, Scheerlinck T (2017) Custom-made triflanged acetabular components in the treatment of major acetabular defects. Short-term results and clinical experience. Acta Orthop Belg 83(3), 341–350. [Google Scholar]
- Goriainov V, King LJ, Oreffo ROC, Dunlop DG (2021) Custom 3D-printed triflange implants for treatment of severe acetabular defects, with and without pelvic discontinuity: early results of our first 19 consecutive cases. JB JS Open Access 6(4), e2100057. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Gao Z, Zhang B, Du Y, Ma H, Tang Y, Liu Y, Zhou Y (2022) The application of custom-made 3D-printed titanium augments designed through surgical simulation for severe bone defects in complex revision total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 23(1), 37. [Google Scholar]
- Fröschen FS, Randau TM, Hischebeth GTR, Gravius N, Gravius S, Walter SG (2020) Mid-term results after revision total hip arthroplasty with custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140(2), 263–273. [Google Scholar]
- Berasi CC, Berend KR, Adams JB, Ruh EL, Lombardi AV (2015) Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2), 528–535. [Google Scholar]
- Morgan S., Amzallag N., Shaked O., Snir N., Gold A., Ashkenazi I., Factor S., Warschawski Y (2023) Accurate restoration of the center of rotation of the hip joint based on preoperative planning is not associated with improved clinical outcomes. Surgeries 4(4), 698–705. [Google Scholar]
- Forde B, Engeln K, Bedair H, Bene N, Talmo C, Nandi S (2018) Restoring femoral offset is the most important technical factor in preventing total hip arthroplasty dislocation. J Orthop 15(1), 131–133. [Google Scholar]
- Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(2), 217–220. [Google Scholar]
- Reina N, Putman S, Desmarchelier R, Sari Ali E, Chiron P, Ollivier M, Jenny JY, Waast D, Mabit C, de Thomasson E, Schwartz C, Oger P, Gayet LE, Migaud H, Ramdane N, Fessy MH, SFHG (2017) Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek’s safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(5), 657–661. [Google Scholar]
- Choi HR, Anderson D, Foster S, Beal M, Lee JA, Barr C, Malchau H, McCarthy J, Kwon YM (2013) Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis. Int Orthop 37(10), 1905–1910. [Google Scholar]
- Weber M, Witzmann L, Wieding J, Grifka J, Renkawitz T, Craiovan B (2019) Customized implants for acetabular Paprosky III defects may be positioned with high accuracy in revision hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 43(10), 2235–2243. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Biddle M, Kennedy IW, Wright PM, Ritchie ND, Meek RMD, Rooney BP (2021) Improving outcomes in acute and chronic periprosthetic hip and knee joint infection with a multidisciplinary approach. Bone Jt Open 2(7), 509–514. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
