EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 11 (2025) SICOT-J, 11 (2025) 50 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 11, 2025
Article Number 50
Number of page(s) 8
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025031
Published online 26 August 2025
  1. Parvizi J, Sim FH (2004) Proximal femoral replacements with megaprostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420, 169–175. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chandrasekar CR, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, et al. (2009) Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal femur. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91, 108–112. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zavras AG, Fice MP, Dandu N, et al. (2022) Indication for proximal femoral replacement is associated with risk of failure. J Arthroplasty 37, 917–924. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hernigou P, Quiennec S, Guissou I (2014) Hip hemiarthroplasty: from Venable and Bohlman to Moore and Thompson. Int Orthop 38, 655–661. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mirabello L, Troisi RJ, Savage SA (2009) Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004: data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. Cancer 115, 1531–1543. [Google Scholar]
  6. Errani C, Mavrogenis AF, Cevolani L, et al. (2017) Treatment for long bone metastases based on a systematic literature review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27, 205–211. [Google Scholar]
  7. Houdek MT, Watts CD, Wyles CC, et al. (2016) Functional and oncologic outcome of cemented endoprosthesis for malignant proximal femoral tumors: proximal femoral endoprosthesis. J Surg Oncol 114, 501–506. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bernthal NM, Schwartz AJ, Oakes DA, et al. (2010) How long do endoprosthetic reconstructions for proximal femoral tumors last? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 2867–2874. [Google Scholar]
  9. Trovarelli G, Pala E, Cappellari A, et al. (2019) Proximal femoral reconstructions: a European “Italian” experience. A case series, Curr Orthop Pract 30, 510–515. [Google Scholar]
  10. Donati D, Zavatta M, Gozzi E, et al. (2001) Modular prosthetic replacement of the proximal femur after resection of a bone tumour: a long-term follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Br 83-B, 1156–1160. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kabukcuoglu Y, Grimer RJ, Tillman RM, Carter SR (1999) Endoprosthetic replacement for primary malignant tumors of the proximal femur, Clin Orthop Relat Res 8–14. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bickels J, Meller I, Henshaw RM, Malawer MM (2000) Reconstruction of hip stability after proximal and total femur resections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 375, 218–230. [Google Scholar]
  13. Harvey N, Ahlmann ER, Allison DC, et al. (2012) Endoprostheses last longer than intramedullary devices in proximal femur metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470, 684–691. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gosheger G, Gebert C, Ahrens H, et al. (2006) Endoprosthetic reconstruction in 250 patients with sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 450, 164–171. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Calabró T, Van Rooyen R, Piraino I, et al. (2016) Reconstruction of the proximal femur with a modular resection prosthesis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26, 415–421. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gusho CA, Clayton B, Mehta N, et al. (2021) Internal fixation versus endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur for metastatic bone disease: Single institutional outcomes. J Orthop 28, 86–90. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nooh A, Alaseem A, Epure LM, et al. (2020) Radiographic, functional, and oncologic outcomes of cemented modular proximal femur replacement using the “french paradox” technique. J Arthroplasty 35, 2567–2572. [Google Scholar]
  18. Toepfer A, Straßer V, Ladurner A, et al. (2021) Different outcomes after proximal femoral replacement in oncologic and failed revision arthroplasty patients – a retrospective cohort study, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22, 813. [Google Scholar]
  19. Innocenti M, Leggieri F, Stimolo D, et al. (2024) Techniques for abductor reattachment in proximal femoral replacement for non-oncological reconstructions: a narrative review. Ann Joint 9, 20–20. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang X, Tang X, Li Z, et al. (2022) Clinical and radiological outcomes of combined modular prothesis and cortical strut for revision proximal femur in giant cell tumor of bone patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 30, 10225536221095202. [Google Scholar]
  21. Donati F, Di Giacomo G, D’Adamio S, et al. (2016) Silver-coated hip megaprosthesis in oncological limb savage surgery. BioMed Res Int 2016, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hardes J, von Eiff C, Streitbuerger A, et al. (2010) Reduction of periprosthetic infection with silver-coated megaprostheses in patients with bone sarcoma: silver-coated prostheses in sarcoma patients. J Surg Oncol 101, 389–395. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fiore M, Sambri A, Zucchini R, et al. (2021) Silver-coated megaprosthesis in prevention and treatment of peri-prosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis about efficacy and toxicity in primary and revision surgery. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31, 201–220. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Azegami S, Gurusamy KS, Parker MJ (2011) Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Hip Int 21, 509–517. [Google Scholar]
  25. Morris HG, Capanna R, Del Ben M, Campanacci D (1995) Prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur after resection for bone tumors. J Arthroplasty 10, 293–299. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zehr RJ, Enneking WF, Scarborough WF (1996) Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 322, 207–223. [Google Scholar]
  27. Unwin PS, Cannon SR, Grimer RJ, et al. (1996) Aseptic loosening in cemented custom-made prosthetic replacements for bone tumours of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ilyas I, Pant R, Kurar A, et al. Modular megaprosthesis for proximal femoral tumors. Int Orthop. 2002;26:170–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-002-0335-7 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ahlmann ER, Menendez LR, Kermani C, Gotha H (2006) Survivorship and clinical outcome of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction for neoplastic disease of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88-B, 790–795. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Farid Y, Lin PP, Lewis PP, Yasko AW (2006) Endoprosthetic and allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal femur for bone neoplasms. Clin Orthop Rel Res 442, 223–229. [Google Scholar]
  31. Menendez LR, Ahlmann ER, Kermani C, Gotha H (2006) Endoprosthetic reconstruction for neoplasms of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Rel Res 450, 46–51. [Google Scholar]
  32. Orlic D, Smerdelj M, Kolundzic R, Bergovec M (2006) Lower limb salvage surgery: modular endoprosthesis in bone tumour treatment. Int Orthop 30, 458–464. [Google Scholar]
  33. Finstein JL, King JJ, Fox EJ, et al. (2007) Bipolar proximal femoral replacement prostheses for musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res 459, 66–75. [Google Scholar]
  34. Selek H, Başarır K, Yıldız Y, Sağlık Y (2008) Cemented endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic bone disease in the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 23, 112–117. [Google Scholar]
  35. Potter BK, Chow VE, Adams SC, et al. (2009) Endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement: metastatic versus primary tumors. Surg Oncol 18, 343–349. [Google Scholar]
  36. Henderson ER, Groundland JS, Pala E, et al. (2011) Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg 93, 418–429. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pala E, Henderson ER, Calabrò T, et al. (2013) Survival of current production tumor endoprostheses: complications, functional results, and a comparative statistical analysis: lower limb tumor prostheses reconstructions. J Surg Oncol 108, 403–408. [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson JD, Perry KI, Yuan BJ, et al. (2019) Outcomes of endoprosthetic replacement for salvage of failed fixation of malignant pathologic proximal femur fractures. J Arthroplasty 34, 700–703. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sørensen MS, Horstmann PF, Hindsø K, Petersen MM (2019) Use of endoprostheses for proximal femur metastases results in a rapid rehabilitation and low risk of implant failure. A prospective population-based study. J Bone Oncol 19, 100264. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yilmaz M, Sørensen MS, Sæbye C, et al. (2019) Long‐term results of the Global Modular Replacement System tumor prosthesis for reconstruction after limb‐sparing bone resections in orthopedic oncologic conditions: results from a national cohort, J Surg Oncol 120, 183–192. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bischel OE, Suda AJ, Böhm PM, et al. (2020) En-bloc resection of metastases of the proximal femur and reconstruction by modular arthroplasty is not only justified in patients with a curative treatment option – an observational study of a consecutive series of 45 patients. J Clin Med 9, 758. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sofulu O, Sirin E, Saglam F, et al. (2022) Implant survival and functional results of endoprosthetic reconstruction for proximal femoral metastases with pathological fractures. HIP Int 32, 174–184. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.