EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 12 (2026) SICOT-J, 12 (2026) 29 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 29
Number of page(s) 8
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2026028
Published online 19 May 2026
  1. Jin C, Song EK, Santoso A, Ingale PS, Choi IS, Seon JK (2020) Survival and risk factor analysis of medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy for unicompartment knee osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy 36, 535–543. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lau LCM, Fan JCH, Chung KY, Cheung KW, Man GCW, Hung YW, et al. (2021) Satisfactory long-term survival, functional and radiological outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy for managing knee osteoarthritis: minimum 10-year follow-up study. J Orthop Translat 26, 60–66. [Google Scholar]
  3. Saito T, Kumagai K, Akamatsu Y, Kobayashi H, Kusayama Y (2014) Five- to ten-year outcome following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with rigid plate fixation in combination with an artificial bone substitute. Bone Joint J 96-B, 339–344. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim GW, Kang JK, Song EK, Seon JK (2021) Increased joint obliquity after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy induces pain in the lateral compartment: a comparative analysis of the minimum 4-year follow-up outcomes using propensity score matching. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 3495–3502. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim JS, Lim JK, Choi HG, Jeong HW, Park SB, Shim SJ, et al. (2022) Excessively increased joint-line obliquity after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy is associated with inferior radiologic and clinical outcomes: what is permissible joint-line obliquity. Arthroscopy 38, 1904–1915. [Google Scholar]
  6. Song JH, Bin SI, Kim JM, Lee BS (2020) What is an acceptable limit of joint-line obliquity after medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy? analysis based on midterm results. Am J Sports Med 48, 3028–3035. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nakayama H, Schroter S, Yamamoto C, Iseki T, Kanto R, Kurosaka K, et al. (2018) Large correction in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with resultant joint-line obliquity induces excessive shear stress on the articular cartilage. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 1873–1878. [Google Scholar]
  8. Xie T, Brouwer RW, Van den Akker-Scheek I, Van der Veen HC (2023) Clinical relevance of joint line obliquity after high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis remains controversial: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 4355–4367. [Google Scholar]
  9. Goshima K, Sawaguchi T, Shigemoto K, Iwai S, Fujita K, Yamamuro Y (2019) Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between normal and overcorrected medial proximal tibial angle groups after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 35, 2898–2908 e1. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim KI, Kim DK, Song SJ, Lee SH, Bae DK (2017) Medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy may adversely affect the patellofemoral joint. Arthroscopy 33, 811–816. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yamada S, Kumagai K, Nejima S, Choe H, Ike H, Kobayashi N, et al. (2024) An increased medial proximal tibial angle of greater than 95 degrees after opening wedge high tibial osteotomy is not associated with deterioration of minimum 10-year clinical outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 145, 4. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bito H, Takeuchi R, Kumagai K, Aratake M, Saito I, Hayashi R, et al. (2009) A predictive factor for acquiring an ideal lower limb realignment after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17, 382–389. [Google Scholar]
  13. Schuster P, Gesslein M, Schlumberger M, Mayer P, Mayr R, Oremek D, et al. (2018) Ten-year results of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and chondral resurfacing in severe medial osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. Am J Sports Med 46, 1362–1370. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosso F, Rossi R, Cantivalli A, Pilone C, Bonasia DE (2022) Joint line obliquity does not affect the outcomes of opening wedge high tibial osteotomy at an average 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 50, 461–470. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim SG, Jun JB, Bae IW, Lee DH (2023) Changes in ankle and hip joints following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy affect knee joint line obliquity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 5420–5427. [Google Scholar]
  16. Matache BA, Jean PO, Pelet S, Roger ME, Dartus J, Belzile EL (2024) Lateral knee laxity increases the risk of excessive joint line obliquity after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 110, 103717. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ryu J, Lee BS, Kim JM, Song JH, Kim HY (2025) Radiographic risk factors for excessive joint line obliquity after knee osteotomy for medial osteoarthritis: a phenotype-based approach. Orthop J Sports Med 13, 23259671251351335. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nejima S, Kumagai K, Yamada S, Sotozawa M, Kumagai D, Yamane H, et al. (2022) Surgical planning of osteotomies around the knee differs between preoperative standing and supine radiographs in nearly half of cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23, 497. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nejima S, Kumagai K, Yamada S, Sotozawa M, Kumagai D, Yamane H, et al. (2022) Potential anatomic risk factors resulting oversized postoperative medial proximal tibial angle after double level osteotomy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23, 1121. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pratobevera A, Seil R, Menetrey J (2024) Joint line and knee osteotomy. EFORT Open Rev 9, 375–386. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.