EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 12 (2026) SICOT-J, 12 (2026) 30 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 30
Number of page(s) 7
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2026003
Published online 19 May 2026
  1. Erard J, Cance N, Shatrov J, et al. (2023) Delaying ACL reconstruction is associated with increased rates of medial meniscal tear. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 4458–4466. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mesnard G, Fournier G, Joseph L, et al. (2022) Does meniscal repair impact muscle strength following ACL reconstruction?. SICOT J 8, 16. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cance N, Erard J, Shatrov J, et al. (2023) Delaying anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction increases the rate and severity of medial chondral injuries. Bone Joint J 105-B, 953–960. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fox MA, Zsidai B, Dadoo S, et al. (2023) Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 39, 1968–1970. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ajuied A, Wong F, SmithC, et al. (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament injury and radiologic progression of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 42, 2242–2252. [Google Scholar]
  6. Di Benedetto P, Di Benedetto E, Fiocchi A, et al. (2016) Causes of failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and revision surgical strategies. Knee Surg Relat Res 28, 319–324. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mastrokalos D, Roustemis AG, Koulalis D (2025) Limited accuracy of transtibial aiming for anatomical femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction. SICOT J, 11, 8. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cinque ME, Kunze KN, Williams BT, et al. (2022) Higher incidence of radiographic posttraumatic osteoarthritis with transtibial femoral tunnel positioning compared with anteromedial femoral tunnel positioning during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 50, 255–263. [Google Scholar]
  9. Byrne KJ, Hughes JD, Gibbs C, et al. (2022) Non-anatomic tunnel position increases the risk of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 1388–1395. [Google Scholar]
  10. Luites JWH, Verdonschot N (2017) Radiographic positions of femoral ACL, AM and PL centres: accuracy of guidelines based on the lateral quadrant method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 2321–2329. [Google Scholar]
  11. Grasso S, Linklater J, Li Q, Parker DA (2018) Validation of an MRI protocol for routine quantitative assessment of tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 46, 1624–1631. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ahn JH, Kim JG, Wang JH, et al. (2012) Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone: an analysis of the factors affecting the development of osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy 28, 1114–1123. [Google Scholar]
  13. de Mees TTCR, Reijman M, Waarsing JH, Meuffels DE (2022) Posteriorly positioned femoral grafts decrease long-term failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, femoral and tibial graft positions did not affect long-term reported outcome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 2003–2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pedneault C, Laverdière C, Hart A, et al. (2019) Evaluating the accuracy of tibial tunnel placement after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 47, 3187–3194. [Google Scholar]
  15. Osti M, Krawinkel A, Ostermann M, et al. (2015) Femoral and tibial graft tunnel parameters after transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43, 2250–2258. [Google Scholar]
  16. Keenan OJF, Holland G, Maempel JF, et al. (2020) Correlations between radiological classification systems and confirmed cartilage loss in severe knee osteoarthritis. Bone Joint J 102, 301–309. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cremer P, Peltier A, Maubisson L, et al. (2020) Positioning of the tibial tunnel after single-bundle ACL primary reconstruction on 3D CT scans: a new method. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2,e615–e622. [Google Scholar]
  18. Magnussen RA, Debieux P, Benjamin B, et al. (2012) A CT-based classification of prior ACL femoral tunnel location for planning revision ACL surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 1298–1306. [Google Scholar]
  19. Warme BA, Ramme AJ, Willey MC, et al. (2012) Reliability of early postoperative radiographic assessment of tunnel placement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 28, 942–951. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shi W-L, Gao Y-T, Zhang K-Y, et al. (2024) Femoral tunnel malposition, increased lateral tibial slope, and decreased notch width index are risk factors for non-traumatic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. Arthroscopy 40, 424–434-e3. [Google Scholar]
  21. Asai S, Kim D, Hoshino Y, et al. (2018) Coronal tibial anteromedial tunnel location has minimal effect on knee biomechanics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 2960–2965. [Google Scholar]
  22. Morgan JA, Dahm D, Levy B, et al. (2012) Femoral tunnel malposition in ACL revision reconstruction. J Knee Surg 25, 361–368. [Google Scholar]
  23. Seo S-S, Kim C-W, Lee C-R, et al. (2019) Effect of femoral tunnel position on stability and clinical outcomes after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the outside-in technique. Arthroscopy 35, 1648–1655. [Google Scholar]
  24. Inoue J, Giusto JD, Dadoo S, et al. (2024) Nonanatomic femoral tunnel placement increases the risk of subsequent meniscal surgery after ACLR: part II-patients without recurrent ACL injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 32, 2780–2789. [Google Scholar]
  25. Curado J, Hulet C, Hardy P, et al. (2020) Very long-term osteoarthritis rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 182 cases with 22-year’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106, 459–463. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.