EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 12 (2026) SICOT-J, 12 (2026) 20 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 20
Number of page(s) 7
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2026020
Published online 29 April 2026
  1. Filis P, Varvarousis D, Ntritsos G, Dimopoulos D, Filis N, Giannakeas N, Korompilias A, Ploumis A (2022) Prosthetic reconstruction following resection of lower extremity bone neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Oncol 36, 100452. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tsukamoto S, Mavrogenis AF, Masunaga T, Kido A, Honoki K, Tanaka Y, Fujii H, Tanaka Y, Errani C (2023) Megaprosthetic reconstruction of the distal femur with a short residual proximal femur following bone tumor resection: A systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res 18(1), 68. [Google Scholar]
  3. Houdek MT, Wagner ER, Wilke BK, Wyles CC, Taunton MJ, Sim FH (2016) Long term outcomes of cemented endoprosthetic reconstruction for periarticular tumors of the distal femur. Knee 23(1), 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  4. Henderson ER, Groundland JS, Pala E, Dennis JA, Wooten R, Cheong D, Windhager R, Kotz RI, Mercuri M, Funovics PT, Hornicek FJ, Temple HT, Ruggieri P, Letson GD (2011) Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: Retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg 93(5), 418–429. [Google Scholar]
  5. Henderson ER, O’Connor MI, Ruggieri P, Windhager R, Funovics PT, Gibbons CL, Guo W, Hornicek FJ, Temple HT, Letson GD (2014) Classification of failure of limb salvage after reconstructive surgery for bone tumours: A modified system Including biological and expandable reconstructions. Bone Joint J 96-B(11), 1436–1440. [Google Scholar]
  6. Roustemis AG, Gavriil P, Goumenos S, Trikoupis I, Karampikas V, Koulouvaris P, Kontogeorgakos V, Savvidou O, Mavrogenis AF, Papagelopoulos PJ (2025) Implant survival and risk factors for failure after proximal femoral megaprosthetic reconstruction. SICOT-J 11, 50. [Google Scholar]
  7. Christ AB, Hornicek FJ, Fabbri N (2021) Distal femoral replacement – Cemented or cementless? Current concepts and review of the literature. J Clin Orthop Trauma 19, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  8. Puga TB, Anderson LF, Olfson ER, O’Connor KP, Box MW, Baylak J, Riehl JT (2025) Cemented and uncemented (press-fit) fixation in distal femur replacement (DFR): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Orthop 2, 184–197. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mellgren A, Tsagkozis P (2025) Outcome of surgical treatment for metastatic bone disease of the distal femur: Observational single-center study of 47 patients. SICOT-J 11, 60. [Google Scholar]
  10. Holm CE, Bömers JP, Villadsen A, Petersen MM (2025) Evaluation of Zimmer® segmental distal femur mega-prostheses: Patient survival, surgical outcomes and functional outcome. J Bone Oncol 55, 100722. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bergin PF, Noveau JB, Jelinek JS, Henshaw RM (2012) Aseptic loosening rates in distal femoral endoprostheses: Does stem size matter? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(3), 743–750. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schwartz AJ, Kabo JM, Eilber FC, Eilber FR, Eckardt JJ (2010) Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses for musculoskeletal tumor: improved survival of modular versus custom implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(8), 2198–2210. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tayara B, Nooh A, Chalopin A, Goulding K, Turcotte RE (2021) Outcomes of cemented distal femoral replacement using “line to line” technique with all-polyethylene tibial implant for tumors. J Arthrop 36(8), 2913–2920. [Google Scholar]
  14. Piakong P, Kiatisevi P, Yau R, Trovarelli G, Lam Y-L, Joyce D, Ruggieri P, Temple HT, Letson D, Binitie O (2020) What is the 10-year survivorship of cemented distal femoral endoprostheses for tumor reconstructions and what radiographic features are associated with survival? Clin Orthop Relat Res 478(11), 2573–2581. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mazaleyrat M, Le Nail L-R, Auberger G, Biau D, Rosset P, Waast D, Gouin F, Bonnevialle P, Ehlinger M, Pasquier G, Vaz G, French Society of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology (SoFCOT) (2020) Survival and complications in hinged knee reconstruction prostheses after distal femoral or proximal tibial tumor resection: A retrospective study of 161 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106(3), 403–407. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dumaine V (2026) Complications of distal femur megaprostheses. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 112(1), 104527. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dhawan R, Spencer Jones R, Cool P (2021) Distal femoral replacement – Does length matter? Mid-term results for distal femoral replacements. Knee 31, 97–109. [Google Scholar]
  18. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ (1993) A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286, 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  19. Haijie L, Dasen L, Tao J, Yi Y, Xiaodong T, Wei G (2018) Implant survival and complication profiles of endoprostheses for treating tumor around the knee in adults: A systematic review of the literature over the past 30 years. J Arthrop 33(4), 1275–1287.e3. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pala E, Trovarelli G, Angelini A, Maraldi M, Berizzi A, Ruggieri P (2017) Megaprosthesis of the knee in tumor and revision surgery. Acta Biomed 88(2S), 129–138. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang H (2022) Application and development of megaprostheses in limb salvage for bone tumors around the knee joint. Cancer Control 29, 107327482210992. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ahlmann ER, Menendez LR, Kermani C, Gotha H (2006) Survivorship and clinical outcome of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction for neoplastic disease of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Brit 88-B(6), 790–795. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jeys LM, Kulkarni A, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Abudu A (2008) Endoprosthetic reconstruction for the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors of the appendicular skeleton and pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg 90(6), 1265–1271. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sharma S, Turcotte RE, Isler MH, Wong C (2006) Cemented rotating hinge endoprosthesis for limb salvage of distal femur tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 450, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mattei JC, Chapat B, Ferembach B, Le Nail L-R, Crenn V, Bizzozero P, Venton G, Kerzoncuf M, Loundnou A, Backstein D, Alshaygy I, Griffin A, Wunder J, Biau D, Gouin F, Rosset P, Rochwerger A (2020) Fixed-hinge cemented modular implants: An effective reconstruction technique following primary distal femoral bone tumor resection. A 136-case multicenter series. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106(3) 397–402. [Google Scholar]
  26. Minami N, Tsukamoto S, Shimizu T, Honoki K, Hasegawa H, Masunaga T, Kido A, Errani C, Mavrogenis AF, Tanaka Y (2024) Coverage of lateral soft tissue defects with sartorius muscle flap after distal femoral replacement for malignant bone tumors. SICOT-J 10, 27. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fiore M, Sambri A, Morante L, Bortoli M, Parisi SC, Panzavolta F, Alesi D, Neri E, Neri MP, Tedeschi S, Zamparini E, Cevolani L, Donati DM, Viale P, Campanacci DA, Zaffagnini S, De Paolis M (2023) Silver-coated distal femur megaprosthesis in chronic infections with severe bone loss: A multicentre case series. JCM 12(20), 6679. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ruggieri P, Mavrogenis AF, Pala E, Abdel-Mota’al M, Mercuri M (2012) Long term results of fixed-hinge megaprostheses in limb salvage for malignancy. Knee 19 (5), 543–549. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bus MPA, Van De Sande MAJ, Fiocco M, Schaap GR, Bramer JAM, Dijkstra SPD (2017) What are the long-term results of MUTARS® modular endoprostheses for reconstruction of tumor resection of the distal femur and proximal tibia? Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(3), 708–718. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jover-Jorge N, González-Rojo P, Amaya-Valero JV, Baixuali-García F, Calva-Ceinós C de la, Angulo-Sánchez MÁ, Lisón JF, Martínez-Gramage J (2024) Evaluating functional outcomes and quality of life in musculoskeletal tumor patients with distal femoral megaprostheses: A case-control study. World J Surg Oncol 22(1), 341. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.