Volume 7, 2021
|Number of page(s)||5|
|Published online||28 October 2021|
Tranexamic acid and reduction of blood transfusion in lower limb trauma surgery: a randomized controlled study
Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Adesh Medical College & Hospital, Kurukshetra, Haryana 136135, India
2 Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Dayanand Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab 141001, India
3 Professor & Head, Department of Pharmacology, Adesh Medical College & Hospital, Kurukshetra, Haryana 136135, India
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab 147001, India
* Corresponding author: email@example.com
Accepted: 9 October 2021
Introduction: Post-operative blood loss in lower limb trauma fractures increases morbidity. Very few studies have evaluated the efficacy of Tranexamic Acid (TXA) in reducing blood loss and the consequent requirement of blood transfusion in the Indian population. Methods: This was a randomized controlled study of 100 patients with lower limb trauma. Fifty patients were given 1 g of TXA before surgery, and 50 patients were not given TXA. The requirement of blood transfusion, fall in Hb, the number of days admitted in the hospital after surgery were recorded, and evidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was monitored. Results: Baseline demographics between the groups were comparable. The required blood transfusion and fall in Hb in patients receiving intra-operative TXA were significantly lower than those not given TXA (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups (p = 0.6). There was no significant difference in the incidence of DVT in both groups. Discussion: TXA helps reduce the morbidity of trauma patients by reducing the requirement for blood transfusion. Its use is safe in lower limb trauma surgery and lowers the cost of therapy to the patient.
Key words: Tranexamic acid / Deep Vein Thrombosis / Blood transfusion
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Lower limb fractures account for approximately one-third of all fractures and may result in substantial mortality and morbidity . Post-operative blood loss leading to anemia, produces significant morbidity like delayed mobilization. It also has been seen to increase the length of hospital stay [2, 3]. Anemia impedes functional mobility and is an independent risk factor for patients not walking post-operatively . Post-operative blood loss is corrected by blood transfusion, which has its own set of complications and increases the total cost of treatment .
Anti-fibrinolytic agents like tranexamic acid (TXA) are used to prevent blood loss. TXA is a synthetic lysine derivative that exerts its effect by reversibly blocking lysine binding sites on plasminogen, preventing fibrin degradation . While preventing blood loss, these agents are known to cause complications, like deep vein thrombosis (DVT), thrombus formation, leading to myocardial or cerebrovascular infarction, renal artery occlusion, etc. [5, 6].
The efficacy and safety of TXA in joint replacement and hip fracture surgery [7–9] have been often validated. However, the administration of TXA in trauma patients is controversial, with strong opinions for [10, 11] and against [12, 13] its use. Moreover, there is limited literature documenting its use in the Indian population. This study was done to address this deficiency and to look at the role of TXA in patients with lower limb trauma. The study aimed to record the requirement of post-operative blood transfusion, average length of hospital stay, incidence of deep vein thrombosis and other thrombotic events.
It was hypothesized that TXA use in trauma patients would reduce blood transfusion requirement without any significant increase in complications.
This study was a single-center, prospective randomized controlled parallel-group study with 1:1 allocation. After obtaining ethical approval from IEC (Ref. No. PHMA/GSMCH-17/IEC-29A), 116 patients of lower limb trauma presenting to the Emergency Department of Civil Hospital, Rajpura between April 2017 to August 2018 were taken up for the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participating patients.
The patients aged 18–60 years, suffering from lower limb trauma were taken up for the study. The presence of an old implant or infection at the fracture site or any blood coagulation disorder were the exclusion criteria for the study. The patients undergoing percutaneous wire placement procedures for fracture fixation were also excluded. The other exclusion criteria were polytrauma, non-consenting patients, a psychiatric patient. Sixteen patients were excluded due to old fracture, percutaneous wire fixation, or non-consenting patient. A total of 100 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled.
The enrolled patients were assessed pre-operatively, and all relevant investigations are done. The patients were taken up for surgery after stabilization of the general condition. Pre-operative blood transfusion was done as required to have an Hb level of at least 9.5 mg/dL. There were 14 patients in group A and 14 patients in group B who were given blood pre-operatively. Since the number of patients receiving blood transfusion pre-operatively is the same, the difference was not significant.
The patients were administered spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia, depending on the anesthetist’s discretion. The patients were treated by internal fixation of fracture using plates or interlocking nails. They were given antibiotic prophylaxis at the beginning of surgery. Intra-operatively, all the patients were given Ringer Lactate and intravenous colloid solution (Haemaccel) for volume replacement.
The patients enrolled were randomly divided into two groups. The random allocation of the patients to either group was done by one of the authors using a random number table. Group A had 50 patients who were given 1 g of TXA intravenously pre-operatively. IV TXA was administered, at the time of the start of the surgical incision, by mixing 1 g of TXA in 100 mL of normal saline. Group B had 50 patients who were kept as a control group and were not given TXA.
The requirement of post-operative blood transfusion was recorded as a primary outcome measure. The post-operative blood transfusion was done if the patients’ Hb level fell below 9.5 mg/dL. The secondary outcome measures included fall in Hb, total hospital stay and DVT evidence. Patients of both groups were monitored by checking Haemoglobin (Hb) levels as required. The Hb readings were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and range.
Other complications were monitored daily by looking for leg swelling for DVT, breathlessness, and fall in saturation for pulmonary embolism, or a cardiac event like angina or myocardial infarction, deterioration of mental status for stroke event. For all the patients who had any of these complaints, a medical opinion was sought and managed accordingly.
The probability of venous thromboembolism was suspected by Wells et al.  Clinical model (Table 1) to assess the pre-test probability of DVT. Patients with a high probability were administered the D-Dimer test and other relevant tests as needed to confirm thromboembolism.
Wells et al. clinical model to assess pre-test probability of deep vein thrombosis.
No prophylactic treatment for DVT was planned. All the patients were monitored for the development of DVT, and treatment was given for symptomatic cases only.
Renal function tests (RFTs) were done post-surgery and at discharge. If the level of serum creatinine was elevated to above 1.4 mg/dL or the level of Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) was higher than 25 mg/dL, then elevated RFT level was diagnosed, and medical consultation was ordered.
The sample size was calculated based on a clinically significant effect with at least a 25% reduction in need of blood transfusion in the post-operative period. Assuming the requirement of blood transfusion in control and intervention group to be 15% and 40% respectively , with a two-sided significance of 0.05 and a power of 80%, a total of 49 patients in each group would be required.
Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2016. Quantitative data comparison between groups was analyzed using a two-sample student t-test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
The demographic details of the 100 patients shown in Table 2 indicate no significant difference between the two groups. Both the groups had a similar number of patients with comorbidities.
Demographic details of 100 patients.
The patients receiving TXA (group A) had less need for blood transfusions as seen in Table 3. All the patients whose Hb fell below 9.5 in the post-operative period were given a blood transfusion. Only 7 of the 50 patients needed blood in group A compared to 40 of the 50 patients in group B.
Comparison of requirement of blood transfusion (post-operative) between the two groups of patients.
After surgery, there was a fall in Hb levels in both groups. This fall in Hb was less pronounced in group A, which was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Table 4 illustrates the comparison of Hb levels done in both groups at various times i.e., at the time of admission, one day before surgery, on the day of surgery (after surgery), and at the time of discharge.
Comparison of Haemoglobin levels done at various times.
There was a statistically insignificant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups. (p = 0.6). Among the 100 patients under study, the average length of their hospital stay was six days (ranging from 4 to 10 days) for patients in group A and 7.3 days (ranging from 4 to 11 days) for the patients in group B.
The complications seen in the two groups are summarized in Table 5. There was one mortality in each group. The cause of the mortality was due to poor general condition, decreased cardiac function, and advanced age. Both of these happened within two weeks of the surgery. Both the patients were progressing well when they suddenly deteriorated and collapsed. They could not be revived and were diagnosed with Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Other complications seen in the two groups.
Leg swelling was seen in four patients of group A and one patient of group B. This was confirmed by doing serial measurements of mid-calf circumference. However, none of the patients complained of pain or raised temperature in the calf area. The swelling subsided on its own within two weeks. There were no patients who complained of weakness of any part of the body or other symptoms of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) in either of the groups.
The elevated levels of serum creatinine and/or BUN were seen in four cases of group A, and three cases of group B. Medical consultation was taken for all these cases and managed accordingly.
The safety of using TXA was evaluated by clinical monitoring of side effects and looking for deranged renal function tests. On comparing the complications in both groups, they were found to be similar. The difference in groups A and B was statistically insignificant (p = 0.7). Hence, there is no increased risk of using TXA in our patients.
TXA is a lysine analog used frequently as an anti-fibrinolytic agent in trauma and major surgeries . Although TXA in orthopedic surgery has been shown to reduce blood transfusions and decrease mortality in patients, optimal dosing, the timing of administration, mechanism, and pharmacokinetics require further elucidation [7, 16–18]. Recent retrospective studies have not shown evidence of increased thromboembolic events .
Our study showed that there was a significant reduction in post-operative blood transfusions. The fall in Hb was less in the TXA group, whereas there was no difference in length of hospital stay in both the groups. Our study also showed no significant rise in complications due to TXA administration.
There were several limitations of our study. The patients were randomized using random number tables without matching for their fracture types and fracture regions. This may result in a probable bias due to different methods of internal fixation and variable duration of surgery, which will, in turn, affect the blood loss.
The dose of TXA used in our study was 1 g, and the timing of administration of TXA to the patient was at the start of the incision. This was as per protocol used by Gausden et al. . Zhang et al. also agreed that the common methods of IV TXA usage are the immediate pre-operative doses of 1 g or 10–15 mg/kg . Lanoiselée et al. pointed out that TXA plasma concentrations were maintained for > 10 mg/L during surgery and for a minimum of 3 h with a pre-operative TXA dose of 1 g in hip arthroplasty .
The use of TXA results in reducing the requirement of post-operative blood transfusion in our study. In view of the high risk of infections and anaphylactic reaction due to blood transfusion, the achievement of less blood transfusion by giving TXA is very important . In a meta-analysis by Zhang et al., the most important finding was a reduced transfusion rate due to TXA . Because of this, patients may have an indirect benefit by reduced chance of transfusion-related risks [8, 23, 24]. Moreover, there is a potential financial benefit associated with the use of TXA in hip fracture surgery when considering less requirement of blood transfusion . Due to the reduction in blood transfusion, the resultant cost of procuring and transfusing blood was saved. This would lead to a reduction in the cost of hospitalization. Sassoon et al.  also concluded that the use of TXA reduces direct and indirect transfusion-related costs when used in surface replacement arthroplasty. Similarly, Howard et al.  found that TXA in patients with postpartum hemorrhage is a cost-effective method to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity.
The difference in fall of Hb levels between the two groups in our study is significant. Zhang et al. in a meta-analysis concluded that IV TXA reduced post-operative hemoglobin decline . Sadeghi et al. also reported a significant difference in post operative hemoglobin level in patients receiving TXA compared to the control group .
The complications seen in the two groups of patients are DVT, death, and deranged renal function tests with almost similar incidence. Zhang et al. in their study, also reported no difference in 90-day mortality or rate of thromboembolic events between two groups of patients, one of which received IV TXA and the other being the control group . The study done by Fischer et al. found no difference in mortality or incidence of DVT in patients getting TXA compared to those not getting TXA .
The use of TXA reduces the requirement of blood transfusion in trauma patients, though there is no significant reduction in days of hospital admission. This results in lowering the cost of therapy to the patient. There is no significant rise in complication in the patients who were administered TXA compared to the placebo. This requires further studies on a larger population group to look for the incidence of complications due to TXA.
The authors declare that they have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to report.
This research did not receive any specific funding.
This study received ethical approval from the Institutional Ethics committee (IEC) of Gian Sagar Medical College & Hospital, Banur, Punjab, India, under the protocol number PHMA/GSMCH-17/IEC-29A.
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and/or families.
All the authors (GK, JS, HS, NJD): Conception and design of the work, analysis & interpretation of data & finalized the present version of the manuscript.
- Kaye JA, Jick H (2004) Epidemiology of lower limb fractures in general practice in the United Kingdom. Inj Prev 10, 368–374. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence VA, Silverstein JH, Cornell JE, Pederson T, Noveck H, Carson JL (2003) Higher Hb level is associated with better early functional recovery after hip fracture repair. Transfusion 43, 1717–1722. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foss NB, Kristensen MT, Kehlet H (2008) Anaemia impedes functional mobility after hip fracture surgery. Age Ageing 37, 173–178. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mannucci PM, Levi M (2007) Prevention and treatment of major blood loss. N Engl J Med 356, 2301–2311. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calapai G, Gangemi S, Mannucci C, et al. (2015) Systematic review of tranexamic acid adverse reactions. J Pharmacovigilance 3, 171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sahu S, Hemlata VA (2014) Adverse events related to blood transfusion. Indian J Anaesth 58, 543–551. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gandhi R, Evans HM, Mahomed SR, Mahomed NN (2013) Tranexamic acid and the reduction of blood loss in total knee and hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. BMC Res Notes 6, 1–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zufferey PJ, Miquet M, Quenet S, et al. (2010) Tranexamic acid in hip fracture surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 104, 23–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amin MS, Habib MK, Rehman AU (2020) Comparison of blood loss between intra-articular and intra-venous administration of tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty. SICOT-J 6, 20. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R, et al. (2010) Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 376, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
- Ker K, Edwards P, Perel P, et al. (2012) Effect of tranexamic acid on surgical bleeding: systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. BMJ 344, e3054. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Napolitano LM, Cohen MJ, Cotton BA, et al. (2013) Tranexamic acid in trauma: how should we use it? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74, 1575–1586. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pusateri AE, Weiskopf RB, Bebarta V, et al. (2013) Tranexamic acid and trauma: current status and knowledge gaps with recommended research priorities. Shock 39, 121–126. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, et al. (1997) Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 350, 1795–1798. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vijay BS, Bedi V, Mitra S, Das B (2013) Role of tranexamic acid in reducing postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirement in patients undergoing hip and femoral surgeries. Saudi J Anaesth 7, 29–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen MJ (2012) Towards hemostatic resuscitation: the changing understanding of acute traumatic biology, massive bleeding, and damage-control resuscitation. Surg Clin North Am 92, 877–891. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu G, Mazzitelli BA, Quek AJ, et al. (2019) Tranexamic acid is an active site inhibitor of urokinase plasminogen activator. Blood Adv 3, 729–733. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramirez RJ, Spinella PC, Bochicchio GV (2017) Tranexamic acid update in trauma. Crit Care Clin 33, 85–99. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poeran J, Rasul R, Suzuki S, et al. (2014) Tranexamic acid use and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty in the United States: retrospective analysis of effectiveness and safety. BMJ 349, g4829. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gausden EB, Garner MR, Warner SJ, et al. (2016) Tranexamic acid in hip fracture patients: a protocol for a randomised, placebo controlled trial on the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in hip fracture patients. BMJ Open 6, e010676. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang P, Bai JZ, He J, Liang Y, Chen P, Wang JC (2018) A systematic review of tranexamic acid usage in patients undergoing femoral fracture surgery. Clin Interv Aging 13, 1579–1591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lanoiselée J, Zufferey PJ, Ollier E, Hodin S, Delavenne X (2018) Perioperative Tranexamic acid in hip arthroplasty (PORTO) study investigators. Is tranexamic acid exposure related to blood loss in hip arthroplasty? A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 84, 310–319. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robertson J, Koyfman OHA (2015) Does tranexamic acid improve outcomes in patients undergoing urgent or emergency surgery? Ann Emerg Med 65, 445–446. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sadeghi M, Mehr-Aein A (2007) Does a single bolus dose of tranexamic acid reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements during hip fracture surgery? A prospective randomized double blind study in 67 patients. Acta Med Iran 45, 437–442. [Google Scholar]
- Farrow LS, Smith TO, Ashcroft GP, Myint PA (2016) A systematic review of tranexamic acid in hip fracture surgery. Br J Clin Pharmacol 82, 1458–1470. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sassoon A, Nam D, Jackups R, Johnson SR, Nunley RM, Barrack RL (2016) Tranexamic acid. Bone Jt J 98(2), 173–178. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howard DC, Skeith A, Caughey AB (2019) Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic tranexamic acid use in women at increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 133, 26S. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer PE, Bulger EM, Perina DG, et al. (2016) Guidance document for the prehospital use of tranexamic acid in injured patients. Prehosp Emerg Care 20, 557–559. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cite this article as: Kaur G, Selhi HS, Delmotra NJ & Singh J (2021) Tranexamic acid and reduction of blood transfusion in lower limb trauma surgery: a randomized controlled study. SICOT-J 7, 53
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.