EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 4 (2018) SICOT-J, 4 (2018) 38 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 4, 2018
Article Number 38
Number of page(s) 6
Section Spine
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2018020
Published online 07 September 2018
  1. Deyo RA, Weinstein JN (2001) Low back pain. New Engl J Med 344, 363–370. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the Maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30, 927–935. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Abdu W, Herkowitz H, Hilibrand A, Albert T, Fischgrund J (2008) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine 33, 2789–2800. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Iguchi T, Kanemura A, Kasahara K, Sato K, Kurihara A, Yoshiya S, Nishida K, Miyamoto H, Doita M (2004) Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms: which is the more critical factor for symptoms: sagittal translation or segment angulation? J Spinal Disord Tech 17, 284–290. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haughton VM, Rogers B, Meyerand ME, Resnick DK (2002) Measuring the axial rotation of lumbar vertebrae in vivo with MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23, 1110–1116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS, Tanaka N, Jeon CH, Andersson GB, Haughton VM (2000) The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25, 3036–3044. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sakai D, Mochida J, Yamamoto Y, Nomura T, Okuma M, Nishimura K, Nakai T, Ando K, Hotta T (2003) Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells embedded in Atelocollagen® gel to the IVD: a potential therapeutic model for disc degeneration. Biomaterials 24, 3531–3541. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chou AI, Nicoll SB (2009) Characterization of photocrosslinked alginate hydrogels for nucleus pulposus cell encapsulation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 91, 187–194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bendtsen M, Bunger CE, Zou X, Foldager C, Joregensen HS (2010) Autologous stem cell therapy maintains vertebral blood flow and contrast diffusion through the endplate in experimental IDD. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(6), E373–E3739. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guterl CC, See EY, Blanquer SB, Pandit A, Ferguson SJ, Benneker LM, Grijpma DW, Sakai D, Eglin D, Alini M, Iatridis JC, Grad S (2013) Challenges and strategies in the repair of ruptured annulus fibrosus. Eur Cell Mater 25, 1–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bron JL, Helder MN, Meisel HJ, Van Royen BJ, Smit TH (2009) Repair, regenerative and supportive therapies of the annulus fibrosus: achievements and challenges. Eur. Spine J. 18, 301–313. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Andersen MO, Le DQS, Chen M, Nygaard JV, Kassem M, Bünger C, Kjems J (2013) Spatially controlled delivery of siRNAs to stem cells in implants generated by multi-component additive manufacturing. Adv Funct Mater 23, 5599–5607. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen M, Le DQS, Hein S, Li P, Nygaard JV, Kassem M, Kjems J, Besenbacher F, Bünger C (2012) Fabrication and characterization of a rapid prototyped tissue engineering scaffold with embedded multicomponent matrix for controlled drug release. Int J Nanomed 7, 4285–4297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schmidt TA, An HS, Lim TH, Nowicki BH, Haughton VM (1998) The stiffness of lumbar spinal motion segments with a high-intensity zone in the anulus fibrosus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23, 2167–2173. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smit TH (2002) The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine − biomechanical considerations. Eur Spine J 11, 137–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilke H-J., Geppert J, Kienle A (2011) Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of the complete porcine spine in comparison with data of the human spine. Eur Spine J 20, 1859–1868. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24, 755–762. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bron JL, van der Veen AJ, Helder MN, van Royen BJ, Smit TH (2010) Biomechanical and in vivo evaluation of experimental closure devices of the annulus fibrosus designed for a goat nucleus replacement model. Eur Spine J 19, 1347–1355. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hegewald AA, Medved F, Feng D, Tsagogiorgas C, Beierfuss A, Schindler GA, Trunk M, Kaps C, Mern DS, Thome C (2013) Enhancing tissue repair in annulus fibrosus defects of the intervertebral disc: analysis of a bio-integrative annulus implant in an in-vivo ovine model. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 9(4), 405–414. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chiang CJ, Cheng CK, Sun JS, Liao CJ, Wang YH, Tsuang YH (2011) The effect of a new anular repair after discectomy in intervertebral disc degeneration: an experimental study using a porcine spine model. Spine 36, 761–769. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bailey A, Araghi A, Blumenthal S, Huffmon GV (2013) Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study of anular repair in lumbar discectomy: two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38, 1161–1169. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ahlgren BD, Lui W, Herkowitz HN, Panjabi MM, Guiboux JP (2000) Effect of anular repair on the healing strength of the intervertebral disc: a sheep model. Spine 25, 2165–2170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Heuer F, Ulrich S, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2008) Biomechanical evaluation of conventional anulus fibrosus closure methods required for nucleus replacement. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 9, 307–313. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Athanasiou KA, Rosenwasser MP, Buckwalter JA, Malinin TI, Mow VC (1991) Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage. J Orthop Res 9, 330–340. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.