Open Access
Volume 4, 2018
Article Number 4
Number of page(s) 5
Section Hip
Published online 21 February 2018
  1. Mwale F, Wang H, Johnson AJ, Mont MA, Antoniou J (2011) Abnormal vascular endothelial growth factor expression in mesenchymal stem cells from both osteonecrotic and osteoarthritic hips. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 69, S56–S61. [Google Scholar]
  2. Scaglione M, Fabbri L, Celli F, Casella F, Guido G (2015) Hip replacement in femoral head osteonecrosis: current concepts. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 12, 51–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang BL, Sun W, Shi ZC, Zhang NF, Yue DB, Guo WS, Shi S-H, Li ZR (2010) Treatment of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head using bone impaction grafting through a femoral neck window. Int Orthop 34, 635–639. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Karrholm J (2012) The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on sur- gical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. Acta Orthop 83, 442–448. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cornell CN, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM (1985) Long-term follow-up of total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis. Orthop Clin N Am 16, 757–769. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergh C, Fenstad AM, Furnes O, Garellick G, Havelin LI, Overgaard S, Pedersen AB, Mäkelä KT, Pulkkinen P, Mohaddes M, Kärrholm J (2014) Increased risk of revision in patients with non-traumatic femoral head necrosis. Acta Orthop 85, 11–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Bennett D, Delanois RE, Saleh KJ, Thongtrangan I, Kuskowski M, Cheng EY, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J, Stiehl JB, Mont MA (2008) Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision? Int Orthop 32, 597–604. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Martz P, Maczynski A, Elsair S, Labattut L, Viard B, Baulot E (2017) Total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cup in osteonecrosis of the femoral head in young patients: over ten years of follow-up. Int Orthop 41, 605–610. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2011) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22- year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 36, 511–518. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Aslanian T, Verdier R (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess wether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38, 1125–1129. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lachiewicz PF, Watters TS (2012) The use of dual-mobility components in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20, 481–486. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Combes A, Migaud H, Girard J, Duhamel A, Fessy MH (2013) Low rate of dislocation of dual mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471, 3891–3900. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Epinette JA, Beracassat R, Tracol P, Pagazani P, Vandenbussche E (2014) Are modern dual mobility cups a valuable option in reducing instability after primary hip arthroplasty, even in younger patients? J Arthroplast 29, 1323–1328. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Philippot R, Farizon F, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Derhi G, Bonnan J, Fessy MH, Lecuire F (2008) Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94(8), e23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, Burdin G, Lautridou C (2011) The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases. Int Orthop 35, 225–230. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fessy MH. Dual mobility: A Stéphanois concept (St Etienne area, France). Maitrise Orthopedique 2006; March 152. [Google Scholar]
  17. Arlet J, Ficat P, Lartigue G (1968) Mode of onset of primary osteonecrosis of the femoral head. (Stage I. Uncomplicated). Study of 20 cases histologically verified by punch biopsy. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 35, 239–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mäkelä KT, Matilainen M, Pulkkinen P, Fenstad AM, Havelin LI, Engesaeter L, et al. (2014) Countrywise results of total hip replacement. An analysis of 438,733 hips based on the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database. Acta Orthop 85, 107–116. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schmolders J, Amvrazis G, Pennekamp PH, Strauss AC, Friedrich MJ, Wimmer MD, Rommelspacher Y, Wirtz DC, Wallny T (2017) Thirteen year follow-up of a cementless femoral stem and a threaded acetabular cup in patients younger than fifty years of age. Int Orthop 41, 39–45. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mont MA, Hungerford DS (1995) Non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77, 459–474. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ortiguera CJ, Pulliam IT, Cabanela ME (1999) Total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis: matched-pair analysis of 188 hips with long-term follow-up. J Arthroplast 14, 21–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Johannson HR, Zywiel MG, Marker DR, Jones LC, McGrath MS, Mont MA (2011) Osteonecrosis is not a predictor of poor outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic literature review. Int Orthop 35, 465–473. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bedard NA, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Greiner JJ, Klaassen AL, Johnston RC (2013) Cementless THA for the treatment of osteonecrosis at 10-year follow-up: have we improved compared to cemented THA? J Arthroplasty 28, 1192–1199. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Prudhon J-L, Desmarchelier R, Hamadouche M, Delaunay C, Verdier R (2017) Causes for revision of dual-mobility and standard primary total hip arthroplasty: matched case–control study based on a prospective multicenter study of two thousand and forty four implants. Int Orthop 41, 455–459. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tarasevicius S, Smailys A, Grigaitis K Robertsson O, Stucinskas J (2017) Short term outcome after THA using dual mobility cup. Report from Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register. Int Orthop 41, 595–598. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Assi C, El-Najjar E, Samaha C, Yammine K (2017) Outcomes of dual mobility cups in a young Middle Eastern population and its influence on life style. Int Orthop 41, 605–610. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Henawy AT, Abdel Badie A (2017) Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in hemiplegic patients. SICOT J. 3, 40, DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2017024. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ochi H, Baba T, Homma Y, Matsumoto M, Watari T, Ozaki Y, Kobayashi H, Kaneko K (2017) Total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach with a dual mobility cup for displaced femoral neck fracture in patients with a high risk of dislocation. SICOT 3 56. DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2017048. [Google Scholar]
  29. Luthra JS, Riyami AR, Allami MK (2016) Dual mobility total hip replacement in a high risk population. SICOT J 2, 43. DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2016037. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.