Open Access
Volume 5, 2019
Article Number 14
Number of page(s) 6
Section Knee
Published online 14 May 2019
  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, De Biase P (1994) Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 22, 211–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chechik O, Amar E, Khashan M, Lador R, Eyal G, Gold A (2013) An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices. Int Orthop 37(2), 201–206. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, Zernicke RF, Hefzy MS (1984) Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg 66(3), 344–352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Patel JV, Church JS, Hall AJ (2000) Central third bone–patellar tendon–bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 16, 67–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Breitfuss H, Povacz P, Resch H, Wicker A (1996) The tendon defect after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the mid third patellar tendon – a problem for the patellofemoral joint? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3, 194–198. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Graf B, Uhr F (1988) Complications of intra-articular anterior cruciate reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 7, 835–848. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kartus J, Stener S, Lindahl S, Engström B, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (1997) Factors affecting donor-site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon bone autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5, 222–228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kohn D, Sander-Beuermann A (1994) Donor-site morbidity after harvest of a bone-tendon-bone patellar tendon autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2, 219–223. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Menon KV (2003) Optimization of the composition of Hydroxyapatite and Bioactive glass composite for load bearing Orthopaedic applications [Dissertation]. MSc Orthopaedic Engineering Cardiff University. [Google Scholar]
  10. Acharya NK, Mahajan CV, Kumar RJ, Varma HK, Menon KV (2010) Can iliac crest reconstruction reduce donor site morbidity? A study using degradable Hydroxyapatite-Bioactive glass ceramic composite. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(4), 266–271. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Menon KV, Varma HK (2005) Radiological outcome of tibial plateau fractures treated with percutaneously introduced synthetic porous Hydroxyapatite granules. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 15, 205–213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Acharya NK, Kumar R, Varma HK, Menon KV (2008) Hydroxyapatite-bioactive glass ceramic composite as stand-alone graft substitute for posterolateral fusion of lumbar spine: A prospective, matched, and controlled study. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(2), 106–111. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferrari JD, Bach BR Jr (1995) Bone graft procurement for patellar defect grafting in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [technical note]. J Arthroscopy 14, 543–545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pinczewski LA, Deehan DJ, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Clingeleffer A (2002) A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 30, 523–536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tsuda E, Okamura Y, Ishibashi Y, Otsuka H, Toh S (2001) Techniques for Reducing Anterior Knee Symptoms after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft. Am J Sports Med 29(4), 450–456. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hu J, Qu J, Xu D, Zhou J, Lu H (2013) Allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int Orthop 37(2), 311–320. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Boszotta H, Pruner K (2000) Refilling of removal defects: impact on extensor mechanism complaints after use of a bone-tendon-bone graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 16(2), 160–164. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sachs RA, Daniel DM, Stone ML, Garfein RF (1989) Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 17, 760–765. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kartus J, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Brandsson S, Karlsson J (2000) Comparison of traditional and subcutaneous patellar tendon harvest: A prospective study of donor site-related problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using different graft harvesting techniques. Am J Sports Med 28, 328–335. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Petruskevicius J, Nielsen S, Kaalund S, Knudsen PR, Overgaard S (2002) No effect of Osteosetâ, a bone graft substitute, on bone healing in humans A prospective randomized double-blind study. Acta Orthop Scand 3(5), 575–578. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Brandsson S, Faxén E, Eriksson BI, Kälebo P, Swärd L, Lundin O, Karlsson J (1998) Closing patellar tendon defects after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: absence of any benefit. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(2), 82–87. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ritchie JR, Parker RD (1996) Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery. Clin Orthop 325, 65–77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Langan P, Fontanetta AP (1987) Rupture of the patellar tendon after use of its central third. Orthop Rev 16, 317–321. [Google Scholar]
  24. McCarroll JR (1983) Fracture of the patella during a golf swing following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: A case report. Am J Sports Med 11, 26–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ouweleen KM, McElroy JJ (1995) A unique complication following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 11, 225–228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Irrgang JJ, Harner CD (1992) Loss of motion following knee ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med, 20(5), 499–506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.