EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 6 (2020) SICOT-J, 6 (2020) 34 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 6, 2020
Article Number 34
Number of page(s) 5
Section Lower Limb
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2020031
Published online 31 August 2020
  1. Rewers A, Hedegaard H, Lezotte D, et al. (2005) Childhood femur fractures, associated injuries, and sociodemographic risk factors: a population-based study. Pediatrics 115(5), e543–e552. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hoffmann CR, Traldi EF, Posser A (2012) Epidemiological study of children diaphyseal femoral fractures. Rev Bras Ortop Engl Ed 47(2), 186–190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carey TP, Galpin RD (1996) Flexible intramedullary nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures. Clin Orthop 332, 110–118. [Google Scholar]
  4. Letts M, Jarvis J, Lawton L, Davidson D (2002) Complications of rigid intramedullary rodding of femoral shaft fractures in children. J Trauma 52, 504–516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tevanov I, Enescu DM, Carp M, Dusca A, Ladaru A, Ulici A (2018) Negative pressure wound therapy in reconstructing extensive leg and foot soft tissue loss in a child: a case study. J Wound Care 27(Sup6), S14–S19. [Google Scholar]
  6. Noordeen MH, Lavy CB, Shergill NS, Tuite JD, Jackson AM (1995) Cyclical micromovement and fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(4), 645–648. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tochie JN, Guifo ML, Yamben MAN, Moulion R, Farikou I (2017) A prospective cohort study of the therapeutic patterns, challenges and outcomes of paediatric femoral fractures in a Cameroonian Tertiary Center. Open Orthop J 11, 29–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Saikia K, Bhuyan S, Bhattacharya T, Saikia S (2007) Titanium elastic nailing in femoral diaphyseal fractures of children in 16 years of age. Indian J Orthop 41(4), 381–385. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fricka KB, Mahar AT, Lee SS, Newton PO (2004) Biomechanical analysis of antegrade and retrograde flexible intramedullary nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures using a synthetic bone model. J Pediatr Orthop 167–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lascombes P, Huber H, Fay R (2013) Flexible intramedullary nailing in children: nail to medullary canal diameters optimal ratio. J Pediatr Orthop 33, 403–408. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lascombes P, Haumont T, Journeau P (2006) Use and abuse of flexible intramedullary nailing in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 26, 827–834. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Deakin DE, Winter H, Jain P, Bache CE (2010) Malunion following flexible intramedullary nails for tibial and femoral fractures in adolescents. J Child Orthop 4(6), 571–577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Li Y, Stabile KJ, Shilt JS (2008) Biomechanical analysis of titanium elastic nail fixation in a pediatric femur fracture model. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 28(8), 874–878. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Luhmann SJ, Schootman M, Schoenecker PL, Dobbs MB, Gordon JE (2003) Complications of titanium elastic nails for pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 23(4), 443–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bopst L, Reinberg O, Lutz N (2007) Femur fracture in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop 27(3), 299–303. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Özdemir HM, Yensel U, Senaran H, Mutlu M, Kutlu A (2003) Immediate percutaneous intramedullary fixation and functional bracing for the treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fracture. J Pediatr Orthop 23(4), 453–457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Economedes DM, Abzug JM, Paryayi E, Hermann MJ (2014) Outcomes using titanium elastic nails for open and close pediatric tibia fractures. Orthopedics 37(7), e619–e624. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Flynn JM, Skaggs DL (2015) Chapter 27: Femoral shaft fractures. In Rockwood and Wilkins’ fractures in children, 8th edn. Flynn JM, Skaggs DL, Waters PM, Editors. Wolters Kluwer Healt: Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
  19. Moroz LA, Launay F, Kocher MS, Newton PO, Frick SL, Sponseller PD, Flynn JM (2006) Titanium elastic nailing of fractures of the femur in children. Predictors of complications and poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88, 1361–1366. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mahar A, Sink E, Faro F, Oka R, Newton PO (2007) Differences in biomechanical stability of femur fracture fixation when using titanium nails of increasing diameter. J Child Orthop 1(3), 211–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sagan ML, Datta JC, Olney BW, Lansford TJ, McIff TE (2010) Residual deformity after treatment of pediatric femur fractures with flexible titanium nails. J Pediatr Orthop 30(7), 638–643. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Parikh SN, Jain VV, Denning J, et al. (2012) Complications of elastic stable intramedullary nailing in pediatric fracture management: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(24), e184. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sink EL, Gralla J, Repine M (2005) Complications of Pediatric Femur Fractures Treated With Titanium Elastic Nails. J Pediatr Orthop 25(5), 577–580. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ligier J, Metaizeau J, Prevot J, Lascombes P (1988) Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 70-B(1), 74–77. [Google Scholar]
  25. Flynn JM, Hresko T, Reynolds RAK, Blasier RD, Davidson R, Kasser J (2001) Titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fractures: a multicenter study of early results with analysis of complications. J Pediatr Orthop 21(1), 4–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nectoux E, Giacomelli MC, Karger C, Gicquel P, Clavert JM (2008) Use of end caps in elastic stable intramedullary nailing of femoral and tibial unstable fractures in children: preliminary results in 11 fractures. J Child Orthop 4, 309–314. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.