Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 6, 2020
Special Issue: "HIP and KNEE Replacement" Guest Editors: C Batailler, S Lustig, J Caton
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 6
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2020010
Published online 07 May 2020
  1. AOANJRR (2013) Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. In: Annual Report. Adelaide, AOA. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Bennett D, Delanois RE, Saleh KJ, Thongtrangan I, Kuskowski M, Cheng EY, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J, Stiehl JB, Mont MA (2008) Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision? Int Orthop 32, 597–604. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA (2002) A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(5), 649–661. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Oparaugo PC, Clarke IC, Malchau H, Herberts P (2001) Correlation of wear debris induced osteolysis and revision with volumetric wear-rates of polyethylene: A survey of 8 reports in the literature. Acta Orthop Scand 72(1), 22–28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sochart DH (1999) Relationship of acetabular wear to osteolysis and loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 363, 135–150. [Google Scholar]
  6. Oonishi H, Clarke IC, Masuda S, Amino H (2001) Study of retrieved acetabular sockets made from high-dose, cross-linked polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 16(8 Suppl 1), 129–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Oonishi H, Kuno M, Tsuji E, Fujsiawa A (1997) The optimum dose of gamma radiation-heavy doses to low wear polyethylene in total hip prostheses. Mater Sci Mater Med 8, 11–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sun DC, Schmidig G, Yau SS, et al. (1997) Correlation between oxidation, cross linking, and wear performance of UHMWPE. 43rd Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society. San Francisco, CA, p. 783. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kurtz SM, Gawel HA, Patel JD (2011) History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 2262–2277. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kurtz SM (2004) Compendium of highly crosslinked and thermal treated UHMWPEs, in The UHMWPE Handbook: Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene in Total Joint, 2nd ed. Kurtz SM, Editor. Elsevier Academic Press: San Diego, CA. p. 354. [Google Scholar]
  11. Callary SA, Solomon LB, Holubowycz OT, Campbell DG, Munn Z, Howie DW (2015) Wear of highly crosslinked polyethylene acetabular components. Acta Orthop 86(2), 159–168. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Takada R, Jinno T, Koga D, Hirao M, Muneta T, Okawa A (2016) Comparison of wear rate and osteolysis between annealed and remelted highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. A case control study at 7 to 10 years follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102(6), 717–721. [Google Scholar]
  13. Glyn-Jones S, Thomas GE, Garfjeld-Roberts P, Gundle R, Taylor A, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW (2015) The John Charnley Award: Highly crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty decreases long-term wear: A double-blind randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2), 432–438. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Currier BH, Currier JH, Mayor MB, Lyford KA, Collier JP, Citters DW (2007) Evaluation of oxidation and fatigue damage of retrieved crossfire polyethylene acetabular cups. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89, 2023–2029. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Halley D, Glassman A, Crowninshield RD (2004) Recurrent dislocation after revision total hip replacement with a large prosthetic femoral head: A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86, 827–830. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hammerberg EM, Zhinian W, Manish D, Lawrence DD (2010) Wear and range of motion of different femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 25, 839–843. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mistry JB, Chughtai M, Elmallah RK, Diedrich A, Le S, Thomas M, Mont MA (2016) Trunnionosis in total hip arthroplasty: A review. J Orthop Traumatol 17(1), 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lavernia CJ, Iacobelli DA, Villa JM, Jones K, Gonzalez JL, Jones WK (2015) Trunnion-head stresses in THA: Are big heads trouble? J Arthroplasty 30(6), 1085. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Good V, Ries M, Barrack RL, et al. (2003) Reduced wear with oxidized zirconium femoral heads. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 85-A(Suppl 4), 105–110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bourne RB, Barrack R, Rorabeck CH, Salehi A, Good V (2005) Arthroplasty options for the young patient: Oxinium on cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441, 159–167. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jonsson BA, Kadar T, Havelin LI, Haugan K, Espehaug B, Indrekvam K, Furnes O, Hallan G (2015) Oxinium modular femoral heads do not reduce polyethylene wear in cemented total hip arthroplasty at five years: A randomised trial of 120 hips using radiostereometric analysis. Bone Joint J 97-B(11), 1463–1469. [Google Scholar]
  22. Karidakis GK, Karachalios T (2015) Oxidized zirconium head on crosslinked polyethylene liner in total hip arthroplasty: A 7- to 12-year in vivo comparative wear study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(12), 3836–3845. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Clement ND, Mitchell M, Trayner ME, Porter DE, Lawson GM, Burnett R (2013) Accelerated polyethylene wear and early failure of the uncemented Reflection acetabular component: A ten to fifteen-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 37(12), 2337–2343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hengst DM, Thomsen PB, Homilius M, Hansen TB, Stilling M (2014) Higher wear-rate of third-generation metal-backed reflection cups with eto-sterilised UHMWPE at a mean 13 years follow-up. Hip Int 24(6), 587–595. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Martell JM, Berdia S (1997) Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79, 1635–1641. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, Freiberg AA, Malchau H (2011) The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: Quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(2), 319–329. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dora C, Burckhardt K, Székely G, Rousson V, Hodler J, Gerber C (2008) A computerized analysis-by-synthesis algorithm improves precision of linear wear measurements in total hip replacements. J Orthop Res 26(8), 1121–1126. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kraay MJ, Moore RD, Martell JM, Rimnac CM (2010) Reassessment of computerized wear measurement for total hip arthroplasty with correction for projectional image distortion: A brief follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(9), 1858–1867. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121, 20–32. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fleiss J (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. New York, NY, John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar]
  31. Johanson PE, Digas G, Herberts P, Thanner J, Kärrholm J (2012) Highly crosslinked polyethylene does not reduce aseptic loosening in cemented THA 10-year findings of a randomized study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(11), 3083–3093. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Geerdink CH, Grimm B, Vencken W, Heyligers IC, Tonino AJ (2009) Cross-linked compared with historical polyethylene in THA: An 8-year clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(4), 979–984. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Röhrl SM, Nivbrant B, Nilsson KG (2012) No adverse effects of submelt-annealed highly crosslinked polyethylene in cemented cups: An RSA study of 8 patients 10 yaers after surgery. Acta Orthop 83(2), 148–152. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Huynh C, Ho H, Sritulanondha S, Engh CA Sr (2012) A prospective, randomized study of cross-linked and non-cross-linked polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty at 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 27(8 Suppl), 2–7.e1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. García-Rey E, García-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A (2013) New polyethylenes in total hip replacement: A ten- to 12-year follow-up study. Bone Joint J 95-B(3), 326–332. [Google Scholar]
  36. Snir N, Kaye ID, Klifto CS, Hamula MJ, Wolfson TS, Schwarzkopf R, Jaffe FF (2014) 10-year follow-up wear analysis of first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29(3), 630–633. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Babovic N, Trousdale RT (2013) Total hip arthroplasty using highly cross-linked polyethylene in patients younger than 50 years with minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 28(5), 815–817. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Morison ZA, Patil S, Khan HA, Bogoch ER, Schemitsch EH, Waddell JP (2014) A randomized controlled trial comparing Oxinium and cobalt-chrome on standard and cross-linked polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 29(9 Suppl), 164–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Garvin KL, White TC, Dusad A, Hartman CW, Martell J (2015) Low wear rates seen in THAs with highly crosslinked polyethylene at 9 to 14 years in patients younger than age 50 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(12), 3829–3835. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tan SC, Lau AC, Del Balso C, Howard JL, Lanting BA, Teeter MG (2016) Tribocorrosion: Ceramic and oxidized zirconium vs cobalt-chromium heads in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31(9), 2064–2071. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Carli A, Koch CN, Esposito CI, Wright TM, Padgett DE (2018) Polyethylene wear increases in liners articulating with scratched oxidized zirconium femoral heads. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476(2), 182–192. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sychterz CJ, Engh CA Jr, Yang A, Engh CA (1999) Analysis of temporal wear patterns of porous-coated acetabular components: Distinguishing between true wear and so-called bedding in. J Bone Joint Surg 81, 821. [Google Scholar]
  43. Callary SA, Solomon LB, Holubowycz OT, Campbell DG, Howie DW (2017) Accuracy of methods to measure femoral head penetration within metal-backed acetabular components. J Orthop Res 35(5), 988–996. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Langlois J, Zaoui A, Scemama C, Martell J, Bragdon C, Hamadouche M (2015) Validation of a computer-assisted method for measurement of radiographic wear in total hip arthroplasty using all polyethylene cemented acetabular components. J Orthop Res 33(3), 417–420. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gaudiani MA, White PB, Ghazi N, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS (2018) Wear rates with large metal and ceramic heads on a second generation highly cross-linked polyethylene at mean 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 33(2), 590–594. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES, Martell JM (2016) Wear and osteolysis of highly crosslinked polyethylene at 10 to 14 years: The effect of femoral head size. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2), 365–371. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.