Open Access
Volume 7, 2021
Article Number 47
Number of page(s) 8
Section Hip
Published online 10 September 2021
  1. Jasty M, Rubash HE, Muratoglu O (2005 Highly cross-linked polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 20, 55–58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dumbleton JH, D’Antonio JA, Manley MT, et al. (2006) The basis for a second-generation highly cross-linked UHMWPE. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453, 265–271. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Broomfield JAJ, Malak TT, Thomas GER, et al. (2017) The relationship between polyethylene wear and periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty at 12 years in a randomized controlled trial cohort. J Arthroplasty 32, 1186–1191. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lambert B, Neut D, van der Veen HC, Bulstra SK (2019) Effects of vitamin E incorporation in polyethylene on oxidative degradation, wear rates, immune response, and infections in total joint arthroplasty: a review of the current literature. Int Orthop 43, 1549–1557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, O’Connor DO, et al. (1999) Unified wear model for highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylenes (UHMWPE). Biomaterials 20, 1463–1470. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McKellop H, Shen F, Lu B, et al. (1999) Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polythylene for total hip replacements. J Orthop Res 17, 157–167. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wannomae KK, Bhattacharyya S, Freiberg A, et al. (2006) In vivo oxidation of retrieved cross-linked ultra–high-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular components with residual free radicals. J Arthroplasty 21, 1005–1011. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wannomae KK, Christensen SD, Freiberg AA, et al. (2006) The effect of real-time aging on the oxidation and wear of highly cross-linked UHMWPE acetabular liners. Biomaterials 27, 1980–1987. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Oral E, Rowell SL, Muratoglu OK (2006) The effect of α-tocopherol on the oxidation and free radical decay in irradiated UHMWPE. Biomaterials 27, 5580–5587. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Galliera E, Ragone V, Marazzi MG, et al. (2018) Vitamin E-stabilized UHMWPE: Biological response on human osteoblasts to wear debris. Clin Chim Acta 486, 18–25. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gigante A, Bottegoni C, Ragone V, Banci L (2015) Effectiveness of Vitamin-E-doped polyethylene in joint replacement: A literature review. J Funct Biomater 6, 889–900. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen W, Bichara DA, Suhardi J, et al. (2017) Effects of vitamin E-diffused highly cross-linked UHMWPE particles on inflammation, apoptosis and immune response against S. aureus. Biomaterials 143, 46–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haider H, Weisenburger JN, Kurtz SM, et al. (2012) Does vitamin E-stabilized ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene address concerns of cross-linked polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 27, 461–469. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nebergall AK, Troelsen A, Rubash HE, et al. (2016) Five-year experience of Vitamin E-diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty assessed by radiostereometric analysis. J Arthroplasty 31, 1251–1255. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nebergall AK, Greene ME, Laursen MB, et al. (2017) Vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty at five years. Bone Joint J 99-B, 577–584. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (2019) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sköldenberg OG, Rysinska AD, Chammout G, et al. (2019) A randomized double-blind noninferiority trial, evaluating migration of a cemented vitamin E-stabilized highly crosslinked component compared with a standard polyethylene component in reverse hybrid total hip arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 101-B, 1192–1198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rochcongar G, Buia G, Bourroux E, et al. (2018) Creep and wear in Vitamin E-infused highly cross-linked polyethylene cups for total hip arthroplasty: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 100, 107–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Salemyr M, Muren O, Ahl T, et al. (2015) Vitamin-E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner compared to standard liners in total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, controlled trial. Int Orthop 39, 1499–1505. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Scemama C, Anract P, Dumaine V, et al. (2017) Does vitamin E-blended polyethylene reduce wear in primary total hip arthroplasty: a blinded randomised clinical trial. Int Orthop 41, 1113–1118. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shareghi B, Johanson PE, Kärrholm J (2015) Femoral head penetration of Vitamin E-infused highly cross-linked polyethylene liners: A randomized radiostereometric study of seventy hips followed for two years. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97, 1366–1371. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shareghi B, Johanson PE, Kärrholm J (2017) Wear of Vitamin E-infused highly cross-linked polyethylene at five years. J Bone Jt Surg Am 99, 1447–1452. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Galea VP, Connelly JW, Shareghi B, et al. (2018) Evaluation of in vivo wear of vitamin E-diffused highly crosslinked polyethylene at five years. Bone Jt J 100B, 1592–1599. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Galea VP, Rojanasopondist P, Laursen M, et al. (2019) Evaluation of Vitamin E-diffused highly crosslinked polyethylene wear and porous titanium-coated shell stability: A seven-year randomized control trial using radiostereometric analysis. Bone Jt J 101 B, 760–767. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. RM (RevMan) (2014) Computer P, Centre V 5. 3. CTNC, Collaboration. TC Review Manager V.5.0. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wyatt MC, Roberton A, Foxall-Smi M, et al. (2020) Does vitamin E highly-crosslinked polyethylene convey an advantage in primary total hip replacement? A systematic review and meta-analysis. HIP Int 30, 598–608. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Atwood SA, Van Citters DW, Patten EW, et al. (2011) Tradeoffs amongst fatigue, wear, and oxidation resistance of cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4, 1033–1045. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Callary SA, Solomon LB, Holubowycz OT, et al. (2015) Wear of highly crosslinked polyethylene acetabular components. Acta Orthop 86, 159–168. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pineau V, Lebel B, Gouzy S, et al. (2010) Dual mobility hip arthroplasty wear measurement: Experimental accuracy assessment using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96, 609–615. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dowd JE, Sychterz CJ, Young AM, Engh CA (2000) Characterization of long-term femoral-head-penetration rates. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82, 1102–1107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. van Erp JHJ, Massier JRA, Halma JJ, et al. (2020) 2-year results of an RCT of 2 uncemented isoelastic monoblock acetabular components: lower wear rate with vitamin E blended highly cross-linked polyethylene compared to ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Acta Orthop 91, 254–259. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Halma JJ, Eshuis R, Vogely HC, et al. (2015) An uncemented iso-elastic monoblock acetabular component: preliminary results. J Arthroplasty 30, 615–621. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zijlstra WP, De Hartog B, Van Steenbergen LN, et al. (2017) Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 88, 395–401. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yamamoto K, Tateiwa T, Takahashi Y (2017) Vitamin E-stabilized highly crosslinked polyethylenes: The role and effectiveness in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 22, 384–390. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lachiewicz PF, Heckman DS, Soileau ES, et al. (2009) Femoral head size and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene at 5 to 8 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 3290–3296. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES, Martell JM (2016) Wear and Osteolysis of Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene at 10 to 14 Years: The Effect of Femoral Head Size. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474, 365–371. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tian JL, Sun L, Hu RY, et al (2017) Correlation of cup inclination angle with liner wear for metal-on-polyethylene in hip primary arthroplasty. Orthop Surg 9, 186–190. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tian J, Sun L, Hu R, et al (2018) Long-term results of primary hip arthroplasty with cup inclination angle bigger than fifty degrees. J Clin Orthop Trauma 9, 133–136. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gallo J, Havranek V, Zapletalova J (2010) Risk factors for accelerated polyethylene wear and osteolysis in ABG I total hip arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 34, 19–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gill HS, Murray DW (2008) The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: A three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Jt Surg – Ser B 90, 556–561. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.