Open Access
Volume 7, 2021
Article Number 50
Number of page(s) 5
Section Spine
Published online 14 September 2021
  1. Wilson JRF, Badhiwala JH, Moghaddamjou A, Martin AR, Fehlings MG (2019) Degenerative cervical myelopathy; A review of the latest advances and future directions in management. Neurospine 16(3), 494–505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Longo UG, Berton A, Denaro L, Salvatore G, Denaro V (2016) Development of the Italian version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score (mJOA-IT): cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness. Eur Spine J 25(9), 2952–2957. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kopjar B, Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Fehlings M (2015) Psychometric properties of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(1), E23–E28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kato S, Oshima Y, Oka H, et al. (2015) Comparison of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and modified JOA (mJOA) score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy: a multicenter observational study [published correction appears in PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0128392] PLoS One 10(4), e0123022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tetreault LA, Côté P, Kopjar B, Arnold P, Fehlings MG (2015) AOSpine North America and International Clinical Trial Research Network. A clinical prediction model to assess surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: internal and external validations using the prospective multicenter AOSpine North American and international datasets of 743 patients. Spine J 15(3), 388–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Augusto MT, Diniz JM, Dantas FLR, Oliveira MF, Rotta JM, Botelho RV (2018) Development of the Portuguese version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity, and responsiveness. World Neurosurg 116, e1092–e1097. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bartels RH, Verbeek AL, Benzel EC, Fehlings MG, Guiot BH (2010) Validation of a translated version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score to assess outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an approach to globalize outcomes assessment tools. Neurosurgery 66(5), 1013–1016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Azimi P, Shahzadi S, Benzel EC, Montazari A (2012) Functional evaluation using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (mJOA) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy disease by age, gender, and type of disease. J Inj Violence Res 4(3 Suppl 1), 42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X (1998) A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res 7(4), 323–335. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tomczak M, Tomczak E, Kleka P, Lew R (2014) Using power analysis to estimate appropriate sample size. Trends Sport Sci 21(4), 195–206. [Google Scholar]
  11. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46(12), 1417–1432. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shaheen AA, Omar MT, Vernon H (2013) Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Arabic version of neck disability index in patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(10), E609–E615. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41(5), 582–592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Microsoft Corporation (2018). Microsoft Excel. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  15. IBM Corp. Released (2020) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ahmed KM, Said HG, Ramadan EKA, Abd El-Radi M, El-Assal MA (2019) Arabic translation and validation of three knee scores, Lysholm Knee Score (LKS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) [published correction appears in SICOT J. 2019;5:27]. SICOT J. 5, 6. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hanbali Y, Perry T, Hanif A, et al. (2019) Reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the Early Onset Scoliosis 24 Items Questionnaire (EOSQ-24). Sicot J 205, 7. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kalsi-Ryan S, Singh A, Massicotte EM, et al. (2013) Ancillary outcome measures for assessment of individuals with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(22 Suppl 1), S111–S122. [Google Scholar]
  19. Singh A, Tetreault L, Casey A, Laing R, Statham P, Fehlings MG (2015) A summary of assessment tools for patients suffering from cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review on validity, reliability and responsiveness. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 2), 209–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, Taketomi E, Ueyama K (2001) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese orthopaedic association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(17), 1890–1895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tetreault L, Nouri A, Kopjar B, Côté P, Fehlings MG (2015) The minimum clinically important difference of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association scale in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(21), 1653–1659. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.