Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 8, 2022
Article Number 43
Number of page(s) 7
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2022043
Published online 11 November 2022
  1. Jameson SS, Baker PN, Mason J, Rymaszewska M, Gregg PJ, Deehan DJ, Reed MR (2013) Independent predictors of failure up to 7.5 years after 35 386 single-brand cementless total hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Bone Joint J 95–B, 747–757. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hoskins WT, Bingham RJ, Lorimer M, de Steiger RN (2020) The effect of size for a hydroxyapatite-coated cementless implant on component revision in total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of 41,265 stems. J Arthroplasty 35, 1074–1078. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kenanidis E, Stamatopoulos TH, Kynigopoulos G, Gamie Z, Tsiridis E, Desy NM, Sierra RJ, Purcell RL, Engh CA, Ngu AWT, Punjabi V, Haddad FS (2018) Implant fixation, in Adult Hip – Master Case Ser. Tech.. Tsiridis E, Editor. Springer International Publishing: Cham. p. 65–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cross MJ, Roger GJ, Spycher J (2014) 7 – Cementless fixation techniques and challenges in joint replacement, in Joint Replacement Technology. Revell PA, Editor. Woodhead Publishing. p. 186–211. [Note: This chapter is an updated version of Chapter 9 from the first edition of Joint replacement technology edited by P. A. Revell and published by Woodhead Publishing 2008]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Magill P, Hill J, O’Brien S, Stevenson M, Machenaud A, Beverland D (2020) Observed effect of femoral component undersizing and a collarless design in the development of radiolucent lines in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 6, 99–103. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech, 34, 859–871. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moazen M, Leonidou A, Pagkalos J, Marghoub A, Fagan MJ, Tsiridis E (2016) Application of far cortical locking technology in periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation: A biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty, 31, 1849–1856. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang K, Kenanidis E, Miodownik M, Tsiridis E, Moazen M (2019) Periprosthetic fracture fixation of the femur following total hip arthroplasty: A review of biomechanical testing – Part II. Clin Biomech, 61, 144–162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. McKellop H, Hoffmann R, Sarmiento A, Ebramzadeh E (1993) Control of motion of tibial fractures with use of a functional brace or an external fixator. A study of cadavera with use of a magnetic motion sensor. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 75, 1019–1025. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoffmann MF, Burgers TA, Mason JJ, Williams BO, Sietsema DL, Jones CB (2014) Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system. Injury, 45, 1035–1041. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Acciaioli A, Lionello G, Baleani M (2018) Experimentally achievable accuracy using a digital image correlation technique in measuring small-magnitude (<0.1%) homogeneous strain fields. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 11, 751. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang K, Kenanidis E, Gamie Z, Suleman K, Miodownik M, Avandi M, Horne D, Thompson J, Tsiridis E, Moazen M (2022) The impact of stem fixation method on the Vancuver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture management. SICOT-J, 8, 1. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rod Davey J, O’Connor DO, Burke DW, Harris WH (1993) Femoral component offset: Its effect on strain in bone-cement. J Arthroplasty, 8, 23–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Duncan CP, Haddad FS (2014) The Unified Classification System (UCS): Improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Jt J, 96 B, 713–716. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rayan F, Dodd M, Haddad FS (2008) European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90, 1576–1579. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Moazen M, Mak JH, Etchels LW, Jin Z, Wilcox RK, Jones AC, Tsiridis E (2014) Periprosthetic femoral fracture – A biomechanical comparison between Vancouver Type B1 and B2 fixation methods. J Arthroplasty, 29, 495–500. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim M, Chung Y, Lee J, Park J (2015) Outcomes of surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures in cementless hip arthroplasty. Hip Pelvis, 27, 146–151. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marsland D, Mears SC (2012) A review of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 3, 107–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tsiridis E, Pavlou G, Venkatesh R, Bobak P, Gie G (2009) Periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty: current concepts in their management. Hip Int, 19, 75–86. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Faisal M, Thomas G, Young SK (2011) Subsidence of the Corail femoral component in the elderly. A retrospective radiological review. Hip Int, 21, 325–329. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Engh CA, Mohan V, Nagowski JP, Sychterz Terefenko CJ, Engh CA (2009) Influence of stem size on clinical outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty with cementless extensively porous-coated femoral components. J Arthroplasty, 24, 554–559. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Buckwalter JA, Einhorn TA, Simon SR, A.A. of O. Surgeons (2000) Orthopaedic basic science: biology and biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system, 2nd edn. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Rosemont, IL. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sköldenberg OG, Bodén HSG, Salemyr MOF, Ahl TE, Adolphson PY (2006) Periprosthetic proximal bone loss after uncemented hip arthroplasty is related to stem size: DXA measurements in 138 patients followed for 2–7 years. Acta Orthop, 77, 386–392. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Al-Dirini RMA, O’Rourke D, Huff D, Martelli S, Taylor M (2018) Biomechanical robustness of a contemporary cementless stem to surgical variation in stem size and position. J Biomech Eng, 140. doi: 10.1115/1.4039824. [Google Scholar]
  25. Abdulkarim A, Ellanti P, Motterlini N, Fahey T, O’Byrne JM (2013) Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop Rev (Pavia), 5, 8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.