EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 12 (2026) SICOT-J, 12 (2026) 32 References
Open Access
Review
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 32
Number of page(s) 8
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2026021
Published online 25 May 2026
  1. Marcano-Fernández F, Camara-Cabrera J, Madden K, et al. (2022) A systematic review of outcome measures in orthopaedic trauma trials: What are we measuring?. Indian J Orthop 56(8), 1316–1326. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wallace JE, Lemaire JB, Ghali WA (2009) Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator. Lancet 374(9702), 1714–1721. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, AbuTaha AS, Zyoud SH, Anayah FMA, Sawalha AF (2017) Bibliometric analysis of worldwide scientific literature in mobile – health: 2006–2016. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 17(1), 72. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lum ZC, Pereira GC, Giordani M, Meehan JP (2019) Top 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery: An update. J Orthop 19, 132–137. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nguyen A, Quan T, Wei C, Wei C, Malahias MA.(2022) Analysis of Eastern Asia’s Contributions to Major Orthopaedic Journals in the Past 21 Years. Cureus. 14(1), e21075. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang JY, Ezzat B, Coenen RJJ, et al. (2024) Bibliometric and trend analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles on lateral interbody fusion (LIF). Neurosurg Rev 47(1), 245. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li L, Wan N, He Y, Zhang Y, He X, Lu L (2023) A global bibliometric and visualized analysis of the status and trends of bone metastasis in breast cancer research from 2002 to 2021. J Bone Oncol 42, 100500. [Google Scholar]
  8. Vaishya R, Rajasekaran S, Gupta BM, Mamdapur GMN, Kappi M, Vaish A (2025) A scientometric analysis of highly-cited papers in Indian Spine Research (1995–2024): Navigating the impact. Int Orthop 49, 779–793. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vaishya R, Gupta BM, Mamdapur GMS, Vaish A, Sadani JN, Mukhopadhyay J (2024) Highly-cited papers on fracture non-union: a bibliometric analysis of the global literature (1990–2023). Indian J Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01176-6. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vaishya R, Gupta BM, Mamdapur GM, Vaish A, Migliorini F (2023) Scientometric analysis of high-cited papers on avascular necrosis of femoral head during 1991–2022. J Orthop Traumatology https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00709-3.. [Google Scholar]
  11. Alzobi OZ, Almannai H, Hantouly A, et al. (2025) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular augmentation: a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited articles. J Knee Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2608-0220 [Google Scholar]
  12. Vaishya R, Gupta BM, Kappi M, Vaish A (2023) International Orthopaedics journal: A bibliometric analysis during 1977–2022. Iberoamerican J Sci Meas Commun 3 (1), 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vaishya R, Gopinathan P, Gupta BM, Mamdapur GMN, Vaish A (2025) Scholarly trends in global orthopaedics research published through the Journal of Orthopaedics: a bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2024. J Orthop. 60, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vaishya R, Sibal A, Arya A (2023) Journey of Apollo Medicine over the last five years. Apollo Med 20, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sweileh WM (2018) Bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed literature in transgender health (1900 – 2017). BMC Int Health Hum Rights 18(1), 16. [Google Scholar]
  16. Trujillo CM, Long TM (2018) Document co-citation analysis to enhance transdisciplinary research. Sci Adv 4(1), e1701130. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lum ZC, Pereira GC, Giordani M, Meehan JP.(2019) Top 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery: An update. J Orthop. 19, 132–137. [Google Scholar]
  18. Donnally CJ 3rd, Lugo-Pico JG, Bondar KJ, Chen CJ, McCormick JR, Errico TJ (2021) Characteristics and trends of the most cited spine Publications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 46(11), 765–771. [Google Scholar]
  19. Paleti S, Kambhampati S, Vaish A, et al. (2025) Rise of Asian research in orthopaedic and sports medicine: a bibliometric analysis from 1996 to 2022. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 35, 173. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ (2014) Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 96(8), 624–630. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(46), 16569–16572. [Google Scholar]
  22. Glänzel W, Schubert A (2005) Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Moed HF, Glänzel W, Schmoch U, Editors. Springer; 257–276. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bornmann L, Daniel HD (2008) What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. J Doc. 64(1), 45–80. [Google Scholar]
  24. Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, Neylon C (2010) Altmetrics: A manifesto. Altmetrics.org. Published 2010. Last accessed on July 14 2025. Available at: https://altmetrics.org/manifesto. [Google Scholar]
  25. Iyengar KP, Vaishya R (2023) Article-level metrics: A new approach to quantify reach and impact of published research. J Orthop. 40, 83–86. [Google Scholar]
  26. Graham SM, Brennan C, Laubscher M, et al. (2019) Orthopaedic research in low-income countries: A bibliometric analysis of the current literature. SICOT-J. 5, 41. [Google Scholar]
  27. Resnik DB, Peddada S, Brunson W Jr. (2009) Research misconduct policies of scientific journals. Account Res. 16(5), 254–267. [Google Scholar]
  28. Iyengar KP, Vaishya R (2023) Article-level metrics: A new approach to quantify reach and impact of published research. J Orthop. 40, 83–86. [Google Scholar]
  29. Vaishya R, Sibal A, Kar S, Reddy S (2025) Integrating artificial intelligence into orthopaedics: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. J Hand Microsurg. 17(4), 100257. [Google Scholar]
  30. Akhtar MN, Haleem A, Javaid M, Mathur S, Vaish A, Vaishya R (2024) Artificial intelligence-based orthopaedic perpetual design. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 49, 102356. [Google Scholar]
  31. Vaish A, Migliorini F, Vaishya R (2023) Artificial intelligence in foot and ankle surgery: current concepts. Künstliche Intelligenz in der Fuß- und Sprunggelenkchirurgie: aktuelle Konzepte. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 52(12), 1011–1016. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tetsworth K, Block S, Glatt V (2017) Putting 3D modelling and 3D printing into practice: virtual surgery and preoperative planning to reconstruct complex post-traumatic skeletal deformities and defects. SICOT-J. 3, 16. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mishra A, Verma T, Vaish A, Vaish R, Vaishya R, Maini L (2019) Virtual preoperative planning and 3D printing are valuable for the management of complex orthopaedic trauma. Chin J Traumatol. 22(6), 350–355. [Google Scholar]
  34. Vaishya R, Dhall S, Vaish A. Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Potential Game Changer in Regenerative Orthopaedics – A Scoping Review (2024) Indian J Orthop. 58(10), 1362–1374. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kaba M, Birhanu Z, Fernandez Villalobos NV, et al. (2023) Health research mentorship in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth. 21(10), 1912–1970. [Google Scholar]
  36. Iyengar KP, Jain VK, Bahl S, Vaishya R (2021) Can open access publishing be made “JUST” for authors from low-middle income countries? Am J Emerg Med. 48, 345–346. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.