EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 12 (2026) SICOT-J, 12 (2026) 44 References
Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 12, 2026
Article Number 44
Number of page(s) 6
Section Knee
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2026043
Published online 28 July 2026
  1. Shan L, Shan B, Suzuki A, et al. (2015) Intermediate and long-term quality of life after total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97, 156–168. [Google Scholar]
  2. Canovas F, Dagneaux L (2018) Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104, S41–S46. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hadi M, Barlow T, Ahmed I, et al. (2015) Does malalignment affect revision rate in total knee replacements: a systematic review of the literature. Springerplus 4, 835. [Google Scholar]
  4. Winnock de Grave P, Kellens J, Luyckx T, et al. (2022) Inverse kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 108, 103305. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tuecking L-R, Savov P, Windhagen H, Ettinger M (2020) Current evidence base for kinematic alignment. Orthopade 49, 584–592. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, et al. (2007) Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 22, 1097–1106. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS (2018) Iatrogenic bone and soft tissue trauma in robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study and validation of a new classification system. J Arthroplasty 33, 2496–2501. [Google Scholar]
  8. Batailler C, Fernandez A, Swan J, et al. (2021) MAKO CT-based robotic arm-assisted system is a reliable procedure for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 3585–3598. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Song E-K, Seon J-K, Yim J-H, et al. (2013) Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA. Clin Orthop Rel Res 471, 118. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liow MHL, Xia Z, Wong MK, et al. (2014) Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. J Arthroplasty 29, 2373–2377. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liow MHL, Goh GS-H, Wong MK, et al. (2017) Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 2942–2951. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Winnock de Grave P, Kellens J, Tampere T, et al. (2023) Clinical outcomes in TKA are enhanced by both robotic assistance and patient specific alignment: a comparative trial in 120 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 3391–3399. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, et al. (2011) The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93, 1588–1596. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim Y-H, Park J-W, Kim J-S, Park S-D (2014) The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 38, 379–385. [Google Scholar]
  15. Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, et al. (2012) The new knee society knee scoring system. Clin Orthop Rel Res® 470, 3. [Google Scholar]
  16. Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2003) The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): From joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcome 1, 64. [Google Scholar]
  17. Van Rossum G, Drake FL (2009) Python 3 Reference Manual. CreateSpace, Scotts Valley, CA. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang J, Ndou WS, Ng N, et al. (2022) Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 2677–2695. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 153–156. [Google Scholar]
  20. Roth VR, Mitchell R, Vachon J, et al. (2017) Periprosthetic infection following primary hip and knee arthroplasty: The impact of limiting the postoperative surveillance period. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 38, 147–153. [Google Scholar]
  21. Weinstein EJ, Stephens-Shields AJ, Newcomb CW, et al. (2023) Incidence, microbiological studies, and factors associated with prosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty. JAMA Netw Open 6, e2340457. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cahill JL, Shadbolt B, Scarvell JM, Smith PN (2008) Quality of life after infection in total joint replacement. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 16, 58–65. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang J, Matzko CN, Sawires A, et al. (2022) Adoption of robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with decreased use of articular constraint and manipulation under anesthesia compared to a manual approach. J Knee Surg 35, 849–857. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ofa SA, Ross BJ, Flick TR, et al. (2020) Robotic total knee arthroplasty vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: A Nationwide database study. Arthroplast Today 6, 1001–1008.e3. [Google Scholar]
  25. Glowalla C, Langer S, Lenze U, et al. (2023) Postoperative full leg radiographs exhibit less residual coronal varus deformity compared to intraoperative measurements in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty with the MAKOTM system. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 3912–3918. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.