Open Access
Issue
SICOT-J
Volume 8, 2022
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 8
Section Hip
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021064
Published online 06 January 2022
  1. Slullitel PA, Oñativia JI, Llano L, Comba F, Zanotti G, Piccaluga F, Buttaro MA (2018) Periprosthetic stress fracture around a well-fixed type 2B short uncemented stem. Sicot J 4, 33. [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen MF, Jakobsen T, Bensen AS, Krarup N (2015) Lower reoperation rate for cemented femoral stem than for uncemented femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty following a displaced femoral neck fracture. Sicot J 1, 26. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tsiridis E, Pavlou G, Venkatesh R, Bobak P, Gie G (2009) Periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasty: current concepts in their management. Hip Int 19(2), 75–86. [Google Scholar]
  4. Leonidou A, Moazen M, Skrzypiec DM, Graham SM, Pagkalos J, Tsiridis E (2013) Evaluation of fracture topography and bone quality in periprosthetic femoral fractures: A preliminary radiographic study of consecutive clinical data. Injury 44, 1799–1804. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lamb JN, Baetz J, Messer-Hannemann P, Adekanmbi I, van Duren BH, Redmond A, et al (2019) A calcar collar is protective against early periprosthetic femoral fracture around cementless femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry study with biomechanical validation. Bone Joint J 101-B, 779–786. [Google Scholar]
  6. Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44, 293–304. [Google Scholar]
  7. Duncan CP, Haddad FS (2014) The Unified Classification System (UCS): Improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Jt J 96 B, 713–716. [Google Scholar]
  8. Phillips TW, Messieh SS, McDonald PD (1990) Femoral stem fixation in hip replacement. A biomechanical comparison of cementless and cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72(3), 431–434. [Google Scholar]
  9. Thomsen MN, Jakubowitz E, Seeger JB, Lee C, Kretzer JP, Clarius M (2008) Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study. Orthopedics 31(7), 653. [Google Scholar]
  10. Burke DW, O’Connor DO, Zalenski EB, Jasty M, Harris WH (1991) Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(1), 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  11. Klasan A, Bäumlein M, Bliemel C, Putnis SE, Neri T, Schofer MD, et al (2019) Cementing of the hip arthroplasty stem increases load-to-failure force: a cadaveric study. Acta Orthop 90(5), 445–449. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones C, Aqil A, Clarke S, Cobb JP (2015) Short uncemented stems allow greater femoral flexibility and may reduce peri-prosthetic fracture risk: a dry bone and cadaveric study. J Orthop Traumatol 16(3), 229–235. [Google Scholar]
  13. Enoksen CH, Wik TS, Klaksvik J, Arthursson AJ, Husby OS, Gjerdet NR (2017) Load transfer in the proximal femur and primary stability of a cemented and uncemented femoral stem: An experimental study on cadaver femurs. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 231(12), 1195–1203. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang K, Kenanidis E, Miodownik M, Tsiridis E, Moazen M (2019) Periprosthetic fracture fixation of the femur following total hip arthroplasty: A review of biomechanical testing – Part II. Clin Biomech 61, 144–162. [Google Scholar]
  15. Moazen M, Jones AC, Jin Z, Wilcox RK, Tsiridis E (2011) Periprosthetic fracture fixation of the femur following total hip arthroplasty: A review of biomechanical testing. Clin Biomech 26(1), 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, et al. (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34(7), 859–871. [Google Scholar]
  17. Moazen M, Mak J, Etchels LW, Jin Z, Wilcox R, Jones AC, et al (2013) The effect of fracture stability on the performance of locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Arthroplasty 28(9), 1589–1595. [Google Scholar]
  18. Moazen M, Leonidou A, Pagkalos J, Marghoub A, Fagan MJ, Tsiridis E (2016). Application of far cortical locking technology in periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation: a biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty 31(8), 1849–1856. [Google Scholar]
  19. Acciaioli A, Lionello G, Baleani M (2018) Experimentally achievable accuracy using a digital image correlation technique in measuring small-magnitude (<0.1%) homogeneous strain fields. Mater (Basel, Switzerland) 11, 751. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ercan A, Sokkar SM, Schmid G, Filler TJ, Abdelkafy A, Jerosch J (2016) Periprosthetic bone density changes after MiniHipTM cementless femoral short stem: one-year results of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study. SICOT J 2, 40. [Google Scholar]
  21. Matsushita A, Nakashima Y, Jingushi S, Yamamoto T, Kuraoka A, Iwamoto Y (2009) Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24(4), 646–651. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rod Davey J, O’Connor DO, Burke DW, Harris WH (1993) Femoral component offset: Its effect on strain in bone-cement. J Arthroplasty 8(1), 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Odén A, Garellick G (2006) Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(1), 26–30. [Google Scholar]
  24. Leonidou A, Moazen M, Lepetsos P, Graham SM, Macheras GA, Tsiridis E (2015) The biomechanical effect of bone quality and fracture topography on locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury 46(2), 213–217. [Google Scholar]
  25. Okudera Y, Kijima H, Yamada S, Konishi N, Kubota H, Tazawa H, et al. (2020) The location of the fracture determines the better solution, osteosynthesis or revision, in periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Orthop 22, 220–224. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.